Teams

Veltri - Chen

2022 Broward TriLevel · 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.79 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-23vs Veltri - Lili'sTeam/SaraWon 21
L#1 DoublesErlinda Gomez / Yonghong Chen vs Angelica Baez / Sarah Nickoson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDominique Jean-Baptiste / Paulette Janice Snagg vs Garbine de la Mora / Andrea Cepero6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJiaqing McGraw / NING YAN vs Andrea Guiulfo / Sara Contreras6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-16vs Broward/Wtc - RivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesPeilan Yao / Erlinda Gomez vs Noelia Diaz / Sahar Moghaddam2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJiaqing McGraw / NING YAN vs Lory Sakay / Diana Navarrete6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-02vs Veltri - Lili'sTeam/SaraSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGabriella Vayshelboym / Erlinda Gomez vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Samie Lesperance1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDominique Jean-Baptiste / Paulette Janice Snagg vs Kerri Paul / Yenny Herrera6-1, 6-3
2022-09-01vs Broward/Wtc - RivasLost 02
L#1 DoublesGabriella Vayshelboym / Erlinda Gomez vs Sahar Moghaddam / Maria Montoto4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNING YAN / Jiaqing McGraw vs Lory Sakay / Graciela Randazzo5-7, 3-6
2022-08-12vs Veltri - Lili'sTeam/SaraLost 01
L#1 DoublesYonghong Chen / Peilan Yao vs Natalia Frantsevskaya / Elizabeth Smalley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-08-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPaulette Janice Snagg / Dominique Jean-Baptiste vs Marianne Rivas / Lissette Loddo6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
3.80
Peilan Yao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Erlinda Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
3.53
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
NING YAN
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
JANNETH CARBALLIDO
published 3.5
3.29
Pilar Escobar
published 3.5
Jody Julmice
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pilar Escobar + JANNETH CARBALLIDO14657% games−6.6% vs expected
Pilar Escobar + Erlinda Gomez6354% gamesnot enough data
JANNETH CARBALLIDO + Erlinda Gomez3250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gabriella Vayshelboym
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Peilan Yao
112W–68L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Erlinda Gomez
100W–97L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Paulette Janice Snagg
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Dominique Jean-Baptiste
103W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
NING YAN
108W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
JANNETH CARBALLIDO
147W–89L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Pilar Escobar
118W–92L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Jody Julmice
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.