Teams

GB:French:Stone

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.5

2 players · average NTRP / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-01-21vs YMCA:Allen:FishLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly French / Laura Stone vs Maridol Allen / Kassandra Fish6-8
2023-01-21vs MTS:Scharpf:ValeriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMolly French / Laura Stone vs Cathleen Scharpf / Kimberly Valeri8-6
2023-01-21vs YMCA:Murray:SuozzoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly French / Laura Stone vs Marcelle Murray / Jana Suozzo3-8
2022-12-04vs YMCA:NobertWon 10
W#2 DoublesMolly French / Patricia Lovejoy vs Denise Nobert / Ann Dahlen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-20vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Stone / Molly French vs Marta Pedersen / Gayle Hincks6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs YMCA:Allen:FishLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Lovejoy / Molly French vs Maridol Allen / Meghan Howell1-6, 0-6
2022-10-30vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#1 DoublesMolly French / Christina King vs Heather Klein / Gayle Hincks6-3, 6-4
2022-10-16vs YMCA:JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly French / Laura Stone vs JOLENE JOHNSON / Sandra Jean2-6, 4-6
2022-10-02vs YMCA:Murray:SuozzoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly French / Laura Stone vs Marcelle Murray / Jana Suozzo0-6, 3-6
2022-09-25vs YMCA:Allen:FishWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Stone / Molly French vs Maridol Allen / Noel Correnti6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-18vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldLost 01
L#1 DoublesMolly French / Andrea Grenier vs Maureen Adams / Elizabeth Kelly1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Diva 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GB:OutOfTheKitchen:Green:Vandette303006
2YMCA:Murray:Suozzo3030010
3HH:Weisberg:Bogle Jubinville3030014
4YMCA:Lade:Sullivan2121114
5YMCA:Correnti:White2121115
6GB:Lafreniere:Carleton1111112
7MTS:Fougere:Dunlop1111113
8RVC:Chaltain:Acosta1111115
9YMCA:Radke:Radke1212223
10MTS:Scharpf:Valeri1212219
11YMCA:Allen:Fish1212222
12GB:French:Stone1212222
13YMCA:Mosle:Jean1212223
14Default000000
15MTS:Nippe:Valeri0303324
16GB:Quinn:Feniger0303324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Laura Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Molly French
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Stone + Molly French183245% games−4.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Stone
82W–75L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
3.51
Molly French
54W–65L career · 11 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.