Teams

YMCA:Lade:Sullivan

2023 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Weekend · Diva 3.5

2 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2023-01-21vs MTS:Nippe:ValeriWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Andrea Sullivan vs Kelsey Nippe / Callie Valeri8-5
2023-01-21vs YMCA:Radke:RadkeWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Andrea Sullivan vs Lori Radke / Taylor Radke8-1
2023-01-21vs GB:OutOfTheKitchen:Green:VandetteLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Andrea Sullivan vs Barbara Green / Cinde Vandette4-8
2022-12-04vs GB:King:FrenchWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Sullivan / Patrice Ruff-Burbine vs Judy Esposito / Joan Gootee3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-20vs YMCA:Correnti:WhiteWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatrice Ruff-Burbine / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Noel Correnti / Sandra Jean3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-11-06vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Sullivan / Annette Kirby vs Linda Gould / Donna Anzalone6-3, 6-2
2022-10-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Sullivan / Patrice Ruff-Burbine vs Carrie Fontaine / Kelly Thomas6-2, 6-1
2022-10-23vs GB:King:FrenchWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Nelson / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Christina King / Kathleen Henry7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs MTS:Scharpf:ValeriWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Susan Bossi vs Kimberly Valeri / Cathleen Scharpf6-4, 7-5
2022-09-25vs MTS:Scharpf:GouldWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Dahlen / Amanda Lade-Sullivan vs Marta Pedersen / Thi Smith6-4, 6-3
2022-09-18vs YMCA:Correnti:WhiteWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmanda Lade-Sullivan / Ann Dahlen vs Nicole Driscoll / Carrie Fontaine7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Diva 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GB:OutOfTheKitchen:Green:Vandette303006
2YMCA:Murray:Suozzo3030010
3HH:Weisberg:Bogle Jubinville3030014
4YMCA:Lade:Sullivan2121114
5YMCA:Correnti:White2121115
6GB:Lafreniere:Carleton1111112
7MTS:Fougere:Dunlop1111113
8RVC:Chaltain:Acosta1111115
9YMCA:Radke:Radke1212223
10MTS:Scharpf:Valeri1212219
11YMCA:Allen:Fish1212222
12GB:French:Stone1212222
13YMCA:Mosle:Jean1212223
14Default000000
15MTS:Nippe:Valeri0303324
16GB:Quinn:Feniger0303324

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Amanda Lade-Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Andrea Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Lade-Sullivan + Andrea Sullivan5456% games+3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Lade-Sullivan
26W–26L career · 8 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Andrea Sullivan
20W–15L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.