Teams

Strassell/Isner - Tri18s W 4.0/3.5/3.0 - Tues PM

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Erin Huffines vs Paige Yates / Dabney Porter6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Sara Strassell vs Joy Martin / Brittany Furr6-7, 6-7
2024-06-04vs Tyler - Tri18s W 4.0/3.5/3.0 TuesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Jacobs / Erin Huffines vs Katie Shane / Sayaka Matsuoka3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Heather Parr
published 4
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Sara Strassell
published
3.65
Tracy Harlan
published
3.56
Cj Isner
published 4
3.35
Reeves Rhoten
published
3.33
Kara Jacobs
published
Andrea Pollina
published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Newkirk
published
3.05
Meghan Hilleboe
published
2.85
Annetta Bartle
published 3
2.83
Deb Budler
published 3
2.78
Gail Terrell
published 3
2.72
Lindsey Whitlatch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Harlan + Heather Parr224 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Parr
40W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
Sara Strassell
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Tracy Harlan
23W–22L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Cj Isner
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Reeves Rhoten
30W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kara Jacobs
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Andrea Pollina
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Newkirk
21W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.10
Meghan Hilleboe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Deb Budler
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
Lindsey Whitlatch
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.