Teams

BC-BJKTC/KazKataoka

2023 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
Daniel Keolasy
published 5
4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.43
EDWARD CHOI
published
4.41
Junko Kuroda
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
TRAM LY
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.34
Grace Lim
published
Andre Law
published 4.5
4.25
Eli Alejo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
CHIKA TAYLOR
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Issei Miyatake
published
4.04
Sayaka Hur
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.04
Anne Bayne
published 4.5
3.98
Rachel Om
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI
published
3.80
Sally Namie
published
3.73
Yoshiki Hida
published
3.71
Nozomi Yokoyama
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Keolasy + Rachel Om13174% games+21.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Daniel Keolasy
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.69
EDWARD CHOI
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Junko Kuroda
117W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
5
TRAM LY
139W–109L career · 4 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.37
Grace Lim
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.34
4.5
Andre Law
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Eli Alejo
97W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
CHIKA TAYLOR
121W–111L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.20
Issei Miyatake
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Sayaka Hur
75W–124L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Anne Bayne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
4.04
4
Rachel Om
164W–64L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.98
HAYATO NISHIGUCHI
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
Sally Namie
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
3.80
Yoshiki Hida
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
97%3%<1%
3.73
Nozomi Yokoyama
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.