Teams

Lambert 55 Summer 2026

2026 ADULT 55 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MEN S26

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs CychoszLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Vidmar / David Casperson vs Tom Olmscheid / Chris Herzog1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPeter Heunisch / Eric Ernst vs Andy Ringlien / Jason Prochnow3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-07-16vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Casperson / Peter Heunisch vs Steve Radermacher / Charles Weed4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEric Ernst / Michael Vidmar vs William Kron / Jon Sundquist7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-02vs CychoszWon 20
W#1 DoublesReed Krider / Christopher Gustilo vs Andy Ringlien / Randy Muetzel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesShravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder vs Paul Schoenecker / Steve Fridinger6-2, 6-2
2026-06-25vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Lambert / Reed Krider vs David Baumgardner / David Holt6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBill Stelle / Will Prest vs David Carberry / Brian Biernat6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Vidmar / Paul Schroeder vs Don Combs / Brian Johnson6-3, 6-3
2026-06-11vs CychoszWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Schneider / Bill Stelle vs Randy Muetzel / Jason Prochnow6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Schroeder / Christopher Gustilo vs Chris Herzog / Andy Ringlien6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Will Prest vs Tom Olmscheid / Douglas Matuska2-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeter Heunisch / Reed Krider vs Jon Sundquist / David Holt4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesPaul Schroeder / Will Prest vs Don Combs / Charles Weed6-2, 6-1
2026-05-21vs CychoszWon 21
W#1 DoublesJim Schneider / Bill Stelle vs Bruce Gullikson / Cory O'Brien6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder vs Tom Olmscheid / Andy Ringlien6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Will Prest vs Ryan Skanse / Paul Schoenecker2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-14vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristopher Gustilo / Daniel Boulay vs Scott Raver / Brian Biernat6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder vs William Kron / Charles Weed6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKarl Lambert / Reed Krider vs Christopher Toal / Paul Bates7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 MEN S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lambert 55 Summer 20266217716141
2Cychosz44121230231
3Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers2661838251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Jim Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Christopher Gustilo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.41
Bill Stelle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Daniel Boulay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.33
Shravan Pargal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Karl Lambert
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.24
Paul Schroeder
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.23
Will Prest
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Peter Heunisch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Michael Vidmar
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Reed Krider
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.03
Ken Pomerantz
published
4.02
David Casperson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jeff Jara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shravan Pargal + Paul Schroeder5059% gamesnot enough data
Peter Heunisch + Daniel Boulay314 matchesnot enough data
Peter Heunisch + Michael Vidmar314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Boulay + Karl Lambert134 matchesnot enough data
David Casperson + Will Prest134 matchesnot enough data
Reed Krider + Karl Lambert404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Vidmar + David Casperson033 matchesnot enough data
Bill Stelle + Jim Schneider303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jim Schneider
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
4.48
4.5
Christopher Gustilo
21W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Bill Stelle
43W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Daniel Boulay
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.38
Shravan Pargal
19W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Karl Lambert
23W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
4.26
Paul Schroeder
62W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.24
Will Prest
19W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
Peter Heunisch
33W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Michael Vidmar
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Reed Krider
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Ken Pomerantz
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
David Casperson
16W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
4.02
Jeff Jara
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.