Teams

Cychosz

2026 ADULT 55 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MEN S26

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-23vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Won 20
W#1 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Chris Herzog vs Michael Vidmar / David Casperson6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Ringlien / Jason Prochnow vs Peter Heunisch / Eric Ernst6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersWon 20
W#1 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Chris Herzog vs Christopher Toal / Erik Gustafson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPaul Schoenecker / Jason Prochnow vs Jon Sundquist / Scott Raver6-3, 6-3
2026-07-02vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAndy Ringlien / Randy Muetzel vs Reed Krider / Christopher Gustilo1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Schoenecker / Steve Fridinger vs Shravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder2-6, 2-6
2026-06-18vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDouglas Matuska / Kenneth Cychosz vs Steve Radermacher / Don Combs6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRandy Muetzel / Andy Ringlien vs Charles Weed / William Kron7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChris Herzog / Philip Postlewaite vs Brian Johnson / Erik Gustafson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-11vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRandy Muetzel / Jason Prochnow vs Jim Schneider / Bill Stelle3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChris Herzog / Andy Ringlien vs Paul Schroeder / Christopher Gustilo1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Douglas Matuska vs Karl Lambert / Will Prest6-2, 7-5
2026-05-28vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersLost 12
W#1 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Douglas Matuska vs David Carberry / Brian Biernat6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Schoenecker / Steve Fridinger vs Erik Gustafson / Jon Sundquist2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Ringlien / Scott Campbell vs Charles Weed / David Baumgardner6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-21vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Gullikson / Cory O'Brien vs Jim Schneider / Bill Stelle1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Andy Ringlien vs Shravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Skanse / Paul Schoenecker vs Karl Lambert / Will Prest2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-07vs Weed: Don Ho and the HoneybadgersWon 21
W#1 DoublesTom Olmscheid / Andy Ringlien vs William Kron / Charles Weed6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKenneth Cychosz / Douglas Matuska vs Scott Raver / Don Combs4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Schoenecker / Jason Prochnow vs David Baumgardner / Jon Sundquist7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 MEN S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lambert 55 Summer 20266217716141
2Cychosz44121230231
3Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers2661838251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Ryan Skanse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.40
Tom Olmscheid
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.32
Chris Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Andy Ringlien
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.27
Douglas Matuska
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Cory O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Glenn Britzius
published 4.5
4.22
Jason Prochnow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.21
Bruce Gullikson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Steve Fridinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Kenneth Cychosz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Philip Postlewaite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Paul Schoenecker
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Randy Muetzel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Ringlien + Tom Olmscheid314 matchesnot enough data
Philip Postlewaite + Chris Herzog404 matchesnot enough data
Cory O'Brien + Bruce Gullikson123 matchesnot enough data
Chris Herzog + Tom Olmscheid303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Skanse
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
4.49
Tom Olmscheid
25W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Chris Herzog
16W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Andy Ringlien
18W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Douglas Matuska
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Cory O'Brien
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Glenn Britzius
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jason Prochnow
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Bruce Gullikson
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
Steve Fridinger
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
Kenneth Cychosz
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
4.09
Philip Postlewaite
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.07
Paul Schoenecker
45W–34L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
Randy Muetzel
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.