Teams

Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers

2026 ADULT 55 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MEN S26

14 players · average NTRP 4.31 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Split 11
W#1 DoublesSteve Radermacher / Charles Weed vs David Casperson / Peter Heunisch6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesWilliam Kron / Jon Sundquist vs Eric Ernst / Michael Vidmar5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-09vs CychoszLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristopher Toal / Erik Gustafson vs Tom Olmscheid / Chris Herzog4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJon Sundquist / Scott Raver vs Paul Schoenecker / Jason Prochnow3-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Baumgardner / David Holt vs Karl Lambert / Reed Krider0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Carberry / Brian Biernat vs Bill Stelle / Will Prest1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDon Combs / Brian Johnson vs Michael Vidmar / Paul Schroeder3-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs CychoszLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Radermacher / Don Combs vs Douglas Matuska / Kenneth Cychosz4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Weed / William Kron vs Randy Muetzel / Andy Ringlien5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Erik Gustafson vs Chris Herzog / Philip Postlewaite7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-04vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Split 11
W#1 DoublesJon Sundquist / David Holt vs Peter Heunisch / Reed Krider6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDon Combs / Charles Weed vs Paul Schroeder / Will Prest2-6, 1-6
2026-05-28vs CychoszWon 21
L#1 DoublesDavid Carberry / Brian Biernat vs Tom Olmscheid / Douglas Matuska1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesErik Gustafson / Jon Sundquist vs Paul Schoenecker / Steve Fridinger6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCharles Weed / David Baumgardner vs Andy Ringlien / Scott Campbell3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-14vs Lambert 55 Summer 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Raver / Brian Biernat vs Christopher Gustilo / Daniel Boulay1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Kron / Charles Weed vs Shravan Pargal / Paul Schroeder1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Toal / Paul Bates vs Karl Lambert / Reed Krider5-7, 3-6
2026-05-07vs CychoszLost 12
L#1 DoublesWilliam Kron / Charles Weed vs Tom Olmscheid / Andy Ringlien4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Raver / Don Combs vs Kenneth Cychosz / Douglas Matuska6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Baumgardner / Jon Sundquist vs Paul Schoenecker / Jason Prochnow6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0 MEN S26
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lambert 55 Summer 20266217716141
2Cychosz44121230231
3Weed: Don Ho and the Honeybadgers2661838251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Carberry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Don Combs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
William Kron
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
Paul Bates
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Jon Sundquist
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.05
Scott Raver
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.04
Brian Biernat
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.01
Erik Gustafson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.00
David Baumgardner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Christopher Toal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Charles Weed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.91
Neil Radermacher
published
Steve Radermacher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Weed + William Kron0738% games−0.4% vs expected
Paul Bates + Neil Radermacher1545% games−1.9% vs expected
Don Combs + Charles Weed134 matchesnot enough data
Erik Gustafson + Charles Weed033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Johnson
22W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
David Carberry
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Don Combs
2W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
4.16
William Kron
13W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Paul Bates
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.10
Jon Sundquist
11W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.10
Scott Raver
2W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Brian Biernat
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Erik Gustafson
14W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
David Baumgardner
7W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Christopher Toal
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Charles Weed
18W–43L career · type A · 10 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Neil Radermacher
13W–15L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.91
Steve Radermacher
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.