Teams

SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Monzon

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-16vs SD 3.5 La Jolla B&TC/ PattersonLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Angel / Lorena Monzon vs Robyne Daniels / Erica Alexander5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNaomi Gallego / Kristan Hanson vs Kristen Patterson / Sarah Suiter2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIrene Steinwinder / Alisa Le vs Jessica Rogge / Leslie Evans6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-11-09vs SD 3.5 Peninsula TC/ LightnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Musicant / Kristan Hanson vs Birte Lightner / Nadine Utz1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMary Garvey / Krista Losito vs Patricia HOLMAN / Megan Wirick-Fierro7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlisa Le / Irene Steinwinder vs Patricia Brennan / Samantha Polikowski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-11-02vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ PadillaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAna Mariela Gamiz / Carrie Musicant vs Marlies Wilbourn / Michele Kelley6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKrista Losito / Irene Steinwinder vs Lisa Shirley / Tenley Gritts1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Dube / Naomi Gallego vs Sylvia Devoe / Aida Padilla6-3, 6-3
2023-10-19vs SD LLW 3.5 Coronado TC/ KimballLost 12
W#1 DoublesLorena Monzon / Sandra Angel vs Erin Enrico / Debora Rozen6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Musicant / Ana Mariela Gamiz vs Jessica Cunningham / Katerina Hart3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKrista Losito / Mary Garvey vs Sarah Kimball / Megan West4-6, 4-6
2023-10-12vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ SchmiedWon 30
W#1 DoublesAna Mariela Gamiz / Carrie Musicant vs Ana Paula Gonzalez / Veronica Marti6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Garvey / Krista Losito vs Caroline Mickel / Heather Grimes6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Dube / Naomi Gallego vs Kari Ursitti / Christy Ward6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-05vs SD 3.5 Mtn View/ SaenzWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarrie Musicant / Ana Mariela Gamiz vs Celina Tiznado / Luisa Garcia de la Cabada6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Garvey / Krista Losito vs Roanne Manzano-Roth / Sarah Dudley6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristan Hanson / Lorena Monzon vs JACQUELINE SAENZ / Irene Roberts0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-09-28vs SD 3.5 SDTRC/ PeinadoWon 20
W#2 DoublesAna Mariela Gamiz / Carrie Musicant vs Jayne Harriman / Tracy Skaddan6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Garvey / Krista Losito vs Marva Gesell / Paula Colarusso6-1, 6-0
2023-09-21vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC/ NicholsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Mariela Gamiz / Krista Losito vs Hayley Connors / Christine Johnson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNaomi Gallego / Heather Ravenscroft vs Jennifer Vernallis / Connie Danielson7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Carrie Musicant
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Mary Garvey
published
3.42
Krista Losito
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.39
Ana Mariela Gamiz
published 3.5
3.33
Naomi Gallego
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Sandra Angel
published
3.25
Irene Steinwinder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Alisa Le
published 3.5
3.24
Kristan Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Heather Ravenscroft
published 3.5
3.07
Donna Dube
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Lorena Monzon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Mariela Gamiz + Mary Garvey10357% games+6.4% vs expected
Kristan Hanson + Donna Dube13560% games+5.3% vs expected
Naomi Gallego + Mary Garvey4253% games+2.4% vs expected
Carrie Musicant + Krista Losito271554% games−2.3% vs expected
Kristan Hanson + Naomi Gallego7451% games−3.0% vs expected
Lorena Monzon + Kristan Hanson91051% gamesnot enough data
Irene Steinwinder + Krista Losito8459% gamesnot enough data
Irene Steinwinder + Naomi Gallego7456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Musicant
119W–72L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Mary Garvey
21W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
4
Krista Losito
61W–54L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ana Mariela Gamiz
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Naomi Gallego
70W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%10%
3.33
Sandra Angel
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Irene Steinwinder
71W–69L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alisa Le
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Kristan Hanson
79W–58L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Heather Ravenscroft
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Donna Dube
118W–125L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Lorena Monzon
68W–95L career · 5 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.