Teams

SGC Chow Fun-Arroyo HS/SU12

2024 Team Singles Fall · SGV - Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-30vs SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SULost 01
L#2 SinglesJosephine Chow vs Pam Barbato0-6, 0-6
2024-11-30vs SGV LFG-Gruaz-Flint Cyn/SA12Won 10
W#2 SinglesVeronica Saucedo vs Sandy Mandel6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-03Won 10
W#3 SinglesVeronica Saucedo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-27Won 10
W#3 SinglesHelen Garner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-20vs SGV Dare Doubles-Gardner-WN/SULost 01
L#3 SinglesAlice Markowski vs Terry Meng7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-13vs SGV LFG-Gruaz-Flint Cyn/SA12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesVeronica Saucedo vs Kris Gruaz4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-10-12Lost 01
L#3 SinglesHelen Garner vs Tiffany Chow3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesHelen Garner vs Vanessa Kettering6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Veronica Saucedo
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.50
LINH LEE
published
3.40
Jasmine M Liu
published
3.39
Demmi Setyono
published 3.5
3.33
Jenniffer Wong
published 3.5
3.16
Kathy Wilkinson
published
3.13
Helen Garner
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Regina Gov
published
2.86
Alice Markowski
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Josephine Chow
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josephine Chow + Jenniffer Wong2541% gamesnot enough data
Jenniffer Wong + LINH LEE404 matchesnot enough data
LINH LEE + Jasmine M Liu303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Veronica Saucedo
145W–113L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
LINH LEE
18W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jasmine M Liu
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Demmi Setyono
6W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Helen Garner
46W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Regina Gov
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Alice Markowski
70W–69L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Josephine Chow
145W–299L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.