Teams

UPTA55A/Sidhu/ACAC

2026 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Men - 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-04vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Seaver)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Miller / Frank Powell vs Jon Joffe / Rhett Hancock3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSteven Szabo / Taylor Starbuck vs Joe Barnes / Doug Bray5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRick Conard / Richard Babcock vs Art Seaver / Richard Russell0-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs UPTA55A/Cooper/BrookstoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteve Miller / Taylor Starbuck vs John Gaber / Mark Curin6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRick Conard / Harvinder Sidhu vs Boyce Markham / Mark Wright6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBen Walker / Richard Babcock vs Randel Cooper / Lucien Woorons3-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs UPTA55A/Gibson/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesFrank Powell / Daryl Tracey vs Lee Chapman / J Mark Trexler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTaylor Starbuck / Steven Szabo vs Barney Pannell / Jeffrey Wolf6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Jacques / Harvinder Sidhu vs Carlton Lewis / Matt Marron3-6, 5-7
2026-03-14vs UPTA55A/Ross/RiversideWon 30
W#1 DoublesTaylor Starbuck / Rick Conard vs John McCoy / Donald Barton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrad Meredith / Daryl Tracey vs Harry Luthi / John Warden7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesFrank Powell / Daniel Jacques vs Garett Matheis / John Spotts6-2, 6-4
2026-03-07vs UPTA55A/Wood/Keowee KeySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDaryl Tracey / Frank Powell vs Steven Lawrence / Bill MacKey6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBrad Meredith / Harvinder Sidhu vs Curt Ulliman / Jim Wood4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-02-28vs UPTA55A/Anderson/CardinalWon 20
W#1 DoublesTaylor Starbuck / Daryl Tracey vs Clark Anderson / Kevin Kessinger6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDaniel Jacques / Brad Meredith vs Calhoun Mays / Frank Vandiver6-2, 6-4
2026-02-21vs UPTA55A/Smith/SpindleTreeLost 12
L#1 DoublesHarvinder Sidhu / Steven Szabo vs Rodger Coubrough / Brian Tucker4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGrant Hunter / Steve Miller vs Kirk Villar / Guillermo Baltazar0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRick Conard / Richard Babcock vs Lanny Holcomb / Jerry Kortenber1-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs UPTA55A/Johnson/KrocLost 12
L#1 DoublesGrant Hunter / Steve Miller vs Douglas Meagher / Scott Juvelier2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFrank Powell / Ben Walker vs Rick Ezell / Brian Green2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRick Conard / Richard Babcock vs Kit Johnson / Neil Grayson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 55+ Adult Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Seaver)7120413163
2UPTA55A/Johnson/Kroc7118614158
3UPTA55A/Gibson/Kroc53131125209
4UPTA55A/Smith/SpindleTree44101429204
5UPTA55A/Sidhu/ACAC35121226215
6UPTA55A/Ross/Riverside3591533240
7UPTA55A/Anderson/Cardinal3581638253
8UPTA55A/Wood/Keowee Key2691534241
9UPTA55A/Cooper/Brookstone2691535254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Daryl Tracey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Daniel Jacques
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Taylor Starbuck
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Frank Powell
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.70
Grant Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Harvinder Sidhu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Rick Conard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.45
Richard Babcock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Brad Meredith
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harvinder Sidhu + Brad Meredith6260% games+19.9% vs expected
Daryl Tracey + Frank Powell7261% games+6.6% vs expected
Daniel Jacques + Brad Meredith4156% games−5.7% vs expected
Taylor Starbuck + Grant Hunter4158% gamesnot enough data
Harvinder Sidhu + Richard Babcock224 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Starbuck + Daryl Tracey213 matchesnot enough data
Harvinder Sidhu + Daniel Jacques033 matchesnot enough data
Harvinder Sidhu + Frank Powell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daryl Tracey
22W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Daniel Jacques
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Taylor Starbuck
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Frank Powell
54W–27L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.71
Grant Hunter
29W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Harvinder Sidhu
48W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Rick Conard
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Richard Babcock
14W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Brad Meredith
58W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.