Teams

UPTA55A/Cooper/Brookstone

2026 UPTA Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55+ Adult Men - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-18vs UPTA55A/Anderson/CardinalLost 02
L#1 DoublesKyle Langill / Mark Peterman vs Kevin Kessinger / Robert Spencer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJohn Gaber / Mark Wright vs Jon Holmes / Benjamin Silverstein6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-11vs UPTA55A/Smith/SpindleTreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLucien Woorons / Mark Wright vs Guillermo Baltazar / Lanny Holcomb6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMark Peterman / Kyle Langill vs Rodger Coubrough / Brian Tucker7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesScott Callison / Marion Hanna vs Robert Jerdan / Ryan Forbes6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2026-04-04vs UPTA55A/Johnson/KrocLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Wright / John Gaber vs Brian Green / Rick Ezell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRandel Cooper / Kyle Langill vs Kit Johnson / MacK Thomason2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBoyce Markham / Mark Curin vs Clay Custer / Chris Helms3-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs UPTA55A/Sidhu/ACACWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Gaber / Mark Curin vs Steve Miller / Taylor Starbuck7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBoyce Markham / Mark Wright vs Rick Conard / Harvinder Sidhu3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRandel Cooper / Lucien Woorons vs Ben Walker / Richard Babcock6-3, 6-2
2026-03-21vs UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Seaver)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Curin / John Gaber vs Jon Joffe / Keith Lonergan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBoyce Markham / Marion Hanna vs Joe Barnes / Doug Bray0-6, 1-6
2026-03-07vs UPTA55A/Gibson/KrocSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Gaber / Kyle Langill vs John Gibson / Matt Marron6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBoyce Markham / Viktor Klep vs Carlton Lewis / Christopher Turner1-6, 1-3
2026-02-28vs UPTA55A/Ross/RiversideWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Gaber / Kyle Langill vs Garett Matheis / John Spotts6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-21vs UPTA55A/Wood/Keowee KeyLost 02
L#1 DoublesViktor Klep / Marion Hanna vs Jim Wood / Gary Boyette5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBoyce Markham / John Gaber vs Steven White / Curt Ulliman2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 55+ Adult Men - 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Seaver)7120413163
2UPTA55A/Johnson/Kroc7118614158
3UPTA55A/Gibson/Kroc53131125209
4UPTA55A/Smith/SpindleTree44101429204
5UPTA55A/Sidhu/ACAC35121226215
6UPTA55A/Ross/Riverside3591533240
7UPTA55A/Anderson/Cardinal3581638253
8UPTA55A/Wood/Keowee Key2691534241
9UPTA55A/Cooper/Brookstone2691535254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kyle Langill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Lucien Woorons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
John Gaber
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.59
Scott Callison
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Mark Curin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.49
Marion Hanna
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Viktor Klep
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Daniel Crumley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Boyce Markham
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.28
Mark Peterman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Randel Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randel Cooper + Mark Curin4446% games+0.3% vs expected
Kyle Langill + Mark Peterman2345% games−0.4% vs expected
Mark Peterman + Lucien Woorons2543% games−1.3% vs expected
Mark Peterman + Randel Cooper2547% games−5.3% vs expected
Kyle Langill + Randel Cooper9451% games−6.5% vs expected
Lucien Woorons + Randel Cooper5159% gamesnot enough data
Scott Callison + Mark Peterman314 matchesnot enough data
Boyce Markham + Mark Curin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Langill
23W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
Lucien Woorons
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.84
John Gaber
10W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Scott Callison
20W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.59
Mark Curin
33W–39L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Marion Hanna
4W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Viktor Klep
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Daniel Crumley
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
4
Boyce Markham
26W–56L career · 5 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.38
Mark Peterman
19W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
Randel Cooper
38W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.