Teams

Terrell 40s 3.0W Mon AM

2025 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-12vs Varner/Davis 40s 3.0W Mon AMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHeidi Boswell / Jennifer Murphy vs Rhonda Glenn / Jamie Cunningham7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Coker / Ashley Vartanian vs Donna Davis / Lora Snyder6-3, 6-4
2025-04-21vs Varner/Davis 40s 3.0W Mon AMWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Boswell / Annetta Bartle vs Jamie Cunningham / Julie Streng1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMiriam DiMond / Erica Worth vs Cathy Taney / Lora Snyder7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuisa Cobos / Laura Loftin vs Sonia Haslam / Jennifer M Riley6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-31vs Varner/Davis 40s 3.0W Mon AMWon 21
W#1 DoublesGail Terrell / Heidi Boswell vs Lora Snyder / Laura Ambler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAriel Holtzman / Jennifer Newkirk vs Jamie Cunningham / Julie Streng7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMiriam DiMond / Susan Wrenn vs Aimee Largen / Rhonda Glenn3-6, 4-6
2025-03-10vs Varner/Davis 40s 3.0W Mon AMLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Morrison / Kelly Guyler vs Laura Ambler / Julie Streng7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAriel Holtzman / Laura Loftin vs Jennifer M Riley / Aimee Largen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMiriam DiMond / Erica Worth vs Cathy Taney / Linda Surber1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Kelly Guyler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.14
Heidi Boswell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jennifer Newkirk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Ashley Vartanian
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Laura Loftin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Ariel Holtzman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Rebecca Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Annetta Bartle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Melissa Coker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Erica Worth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Luisa Cobos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Gail Terrell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Lindsey Whitlatch
published
2.66
Susan Wrenn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Miriam DiMond
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alison Barakat
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariel Holtzman + Jennifer Newkirk5061% games+7.1% vs expected
Rebecca Morrison + Ashley Vartanian314 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Gail Terrell213 matchesnot enough data
Annetta Bartle + Laura Loftin303 matchesnot enough data
Gail Terrell + Rebecca Morrison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Guyler
31W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Heidi Boswell
25W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jennifer Newkirk
21W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Ashley Vartanian
34W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
Laura Loftin
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Ariel Holtzman
24W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Rebecca Morrison
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Annetta Bartle
15W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Melissa Coker
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Erica Worth
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Luisa Cobos
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Gail Terrell
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Lindsey Whitlatch
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Susan Wrenn
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
Miriam DiMond
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Alison Barakat
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.