Teams

THPRD-Horenstein/Li

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.7 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Charles Taguet
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.85
David Pham
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.53
PHAT Lee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Heike Droste
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Srinivasa Kanamatha
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Patty Chen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Hoover Li
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Hien Lu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Heberlein
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Jeff Ruby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2019-12-01Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHeike Droste / Hien Lu vs Stephanie Haas / Julian Miller6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHoover Li / Patty Chen vs Susha Pratt / Peter Farrelly7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLaurie Horenstein / PHAT Lee vs Katie Chong / Michael Arellano6-3, 6-2
2019-11-24Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaurie Horenstein / PHAT Lee vs Ariana White / Meshi Chavez4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWoohyung Kim / Charles Taguet vs Jason Moore-Greenke / Michele Sutherland6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKimiko Kotsugi / Hoover Li vs Casey Billings / Scott Reis6-2, 6-3
2019-11-03Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeike Droste / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Jian Zeng / Nina Nguyen5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJamie Heberlein / Michael Davis vs Jonathan Hong / Joyce Wang1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCharles Taguet / Woohyung Kim vs Morganne Hatfield / Adam Oken6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2019-10-27Won 30
W#1 DoublesCharles Taguet / Jamie Heberlein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Ruby / Kimiko Kotsugi vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-10-20Split 11
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kuhr / Hien Lu vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Willis Boyer7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeike Droste / PHAT Lee vs Deborah Naugler / Rob Chandler6-3, 6-3
2019-10-06Split 11
W#1 DoublesJamie Heberlein / David Pham vs Shaoping Lin / Norine Nelson Martin7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPatty Chen / Jeff Ruby vs Brad Shafer / Jennifer Bane6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2019-09-28Won 20
W#2 DoublesKimiko Kotsugi / Srinivasa Kanamatha vs Rajan Mehndiratta / Kusum Mehndiratta6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kuhr / Hien Lu vs Vimal Natarajan / Weizhen Guo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-09-13Won 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Pham / Theresa Fichter vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHoover Li / Kimiko Kotsugi vs Heather Watkins / Stanley Hanks6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesPHAT Lee / Laurie Horenstein vs JULIE ANDREWS / Wes Schalk6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Charles Taguet
104W–63L career
41%59%0%
3.89
4
David Pham
147W–109L career
0%98%2%
3.85
4
PHAT Lee
44W–33L career
30%70%0%
3.53
3.5
Heike Droste
158W–91L career
0%89%11%
3.46
3.5
Srinivasa Kanamatha
75W–55L career
0%95%5%
3.40
3.5
Patty Chen
59W–56L career
6%94%0%
3.15
3.5
Hoover Li
61W–51L career
18%81%1%
3.12
3.5
Hien Lu
52W–60L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Jamie Heberlein
45W–47L career
31%68%1%
3.05
3.5
Jeff Ruby
22W–43L career
35%65%0%
3.00

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.