Teams

Myler

2024 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - POCATELLO · Mixed 6.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-24vs BengalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Shauna Myler vs Jordon Michaelson / Kailey Pease6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeather McGeehan / AJ DeCato vs Kaylee Walker / Morrgan Michaelson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrenton Murray / Victoria Scharp vs Russell Duffey / Laura Kelley3-6, 4-6
2024-02-17vs Lob-starsLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Victoria Scharp vs Nicolle Peterson / Matthew Peterson4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Hansen / Howard Hansen vs Amy Lapp / Levi Jensen7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHeather McGeehan / AJ DeCato vs Anita Gibson / David Lu6-7, 5-7
2024-02-10vs HeadLost 03
L#1 DoublesHeather McGeehan / Rigel Leith vs LEIF TAPANILA / Camille Aguinaga5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Davids / AJ DeCato vs Joe Andersen / Mary Marshall2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesShauna Myler / Trenton Murray vs Lori Head / John M Head5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-02-03vs KuhnWon 21
W#1 DoublesTrenton Murray / Victoria Scharp vs Ron Malooly / Cami Ellis7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeather McGeehan / Rigel Leith vs Monica Mispireta / David Davis7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesColleen Hansen / Brendan McGeehan vs Darren Kuhn / Kathy Kuhn7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-24vs Lob-starsWon 30
W#1 DoublesHeather McGeehan / Rigel Leith vs Anita Gibson / Matthew Peterson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrendan McGeehan / Shauna Myler vs Gina Nielsen / Rigby Swenson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesVictoria Scharp / Trenton Murray vs Amy Lapp / Nathan Stradinger6-4, 7-5
2024-01-20vs BengalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Hansen / Howard Hansen vs Morrgan Michaelson / Paige Sheffield4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTrenton Murray / Victoria Scharp vs Russell Duffey / Jennifer Vidales6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAJ DeCato / Shauna Myler vs Md Mosharaf Hossan / Laura Kelley6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2024-01-19vs HeadLost 12
L#1 DoublesAJ DeCato / Sarah Davids vs John M Head / Lori Head0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Hansen / Howard Hansen vs Joe Andersen / Camille Aguinaga0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesShauna Myler / Rigel Leith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-01-12vs KuhnLost 03
L#1 DoublesAJ DeCato / Sarah Davids vs Michele Surmelis / Rene Sepulveda Castro4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesColleen Hansen / Howard Hansen vs Panayota Semons-Short / David Davis1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTrenton Murray / Victoria Scharp vs Cami Ellis / Ron Malooly3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Mixed 6.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lob-stars53121228227
2Bengals44131127227
3Head3591534242
4Myler2681635254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Sarah Davids
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.05
Trenton Murray
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Shauna Myler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.75
Howard Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Brendan McGeehan
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.69
Victoria Scharp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Colleen Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.55
AJ DeCato
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Heather McGeehan
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rigel Leith
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather McGeehan + Brendan McGeehan2641% games−0.1% vs expected
Victoria Scharp + Trenton Murray71051% games−9.4% vs expected
Colleen Hansen + Howard Hansen11034% games−13.2% vs expected
Howard Hansen + Victoria Scharp224 matchesnot enough data
Victoria Scharp + Brendan McGeehan224 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Davids + AJ DeCato033 matchesnot enough data
Rigel Leith + Heather McGeehan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Davids
38W–36L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
3
Trenton Murray
40W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Shauna Myler
104W–147L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.85
Howard Hansen
14W–62L career · 4 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.75
3
Brendan McGeehan
105W–88L career · 9 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Victoria Scharp
101W–160L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Colleen Hansen
46W–112L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
AJ DeCato
7W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
2.55
Heather McGeehan
36W–41L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rigel Leith
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.