Teams

WOB:Woburn;Maguire

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 4.5W

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-11vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Irving / Adlina Paramarta vs Cynthia George / Donna Shea4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-12-04vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Dyakiv / Adlina Paramarta vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-28vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington7-6, 3-4, 1-0
2022-11-28vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-20vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesAdlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving vs Simona Kylberger / CariAnne Kreml0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-11-13vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Irving / Anna Dyakiv vs Cynthia George / Patricia Krumholz7-5, 3-5, 1-0
2022-10-30vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Dyakiv / Dominika Langnerova vs Jennifer Cunningham / Simona Kylberger0-6, 2-6
2022-10-23vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaLost 01
L#1 DoublesDominika Langnerova / Adlina Paramarta vs Carolyn Mahoney / Elizabeth Murphy3-6, 2-6
2022-10-09vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesDominika Langnerova / Adlina Paramarta vs Mary Carroll / Jennifer Cunningham1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Wayland:Carroll/Kreml9090142
2WOB:Woburn;Maguire54541391
3LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:Luneau36361489
4WEY:Weymouth:Shea18181691

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Adlina Paramarta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Anna Dyakiv
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Dominika Langnerova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.70
Nancy Irving
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Irving + Adlina Paramarta6249% games+3.0% vs expected
Dominika Langnerova + Anna Dyakiv033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Adlina Paramarta
39W–23L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Anna Dyakiv
19W–23L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Dominika Langnerova
12W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
Nancy Irving
30W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.