Teams

LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:Luneau

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 4.5W

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-22vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs CariAnne Kreml / Jennifer Cunningham0-6, 2-6
2022-12-22vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs CariAnne Kreml / Jennifer Cunningham2-6, 4-6
2022-12-10vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Patricia Krumholz / Giovanna LoCicero2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-12-10vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Donna Shea / Cynthia George2-6, 5-4, 1-0
2022-12-04vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Anna Dyakiv / Adlina Paramarta6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-11-28vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Adlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving6-7, 4-3, 0-1
2022-11-28vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireLost 01
L#1 DoublesJuana Luneau / Sandra Harrington vs Adlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-10-02vs LFW:Wayland:Carroll/KremlLost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsey Keeler / Elizabeth Straub vs Jennifer Cunningham / CariAnne Kreml3-6, 3-6
2022-09-25vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Harrington / Juana Luneau vs Patricia Krumholz / Giovanna LoCicero6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Wayland:Carroll/Kreml9090142
2WOB:Woburn;Maguire54541391
3LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:Luneau36361489
4WEY:Weymouth:Shea18181691

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.19 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Elizabeth Straub
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Juana Luneau
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.14
Sandra Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Lindsey Keeler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juana Luneau + Sandra Harrington613056% games+2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Straub
124W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
Juana Luneau
220W–86L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
Sandra Harrington
132W–80L career · 8 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
4.14
Lindsey Keeler
25W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.