Teams

LFW:Wayland:Carroll/Kreml

2022 EMA Tri Level Fall 2022 · 4.5W

4 players · average NTRP 5.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-22vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesCariAnne Kreml / Jennifer Cunningham vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington6-0, 6-2
2022-12-22vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesCariAnne Kreml / Jennifer Cunningham vs Juana Luneau / Sandra Harrington6-2, 6-4
2022-11-20vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesSimona Kylberger / CariAnne Kreml vs Adlina Paramarta / Nancy Irving6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Jennifer Cunningham vs Cynthia George / Giovanna LoCicero6-4, 6-2
2022-10-30vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cunningham / Simona Kylberger vs Anna Dyakiv / Dominika Langnerova6-0, 6-2
2022-10-16vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesSimona Kylberger / CariAnne Kreml vs Giovanna LoCicero / Donna Shea6-4, 6-1
2022-10-09vs WOB:Woburn;MaguireWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Jennifer Cunningham vs Dominika Langnerova / Adlina Paramarta6-1, 6-1
2022-10-02vs LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:LuneauWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Cunningham / CariAnne Kreml vs Lindsey Keeler / Elizabeth Straub6-3, 6-3
2022-09-22vs WEY:Weymouth:SheaWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Carroll / Simona Kylberger vs Carolyn Mahoney / Elizabeth Murphy6-3, 4-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LFW:Wayland:Carroll/Kreml9090142
2WOB:Woburn;Maguire54541391
3LFNH:LFW New Hampshire:Luneau36361489
4WEY:Weymouth:Shea18181691

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Simona Kylberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
CariAnne Kreml
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.34
Mary Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jennifer Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Cunningham + Mary Carroll7163% games+27.9% vs expected
Jennifer Cunningham + CariAnne Kreml7459% games+21.9% vs expected
Jennifer Cunningham + Simona Kylberger2449% games+17.7% vs expected
Mary Carroll + Simona Kylberger5067% games+12.1% vs expected
CariAnne Kreml + Simona Kylberger6264% games+10.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Simona Kylberger
112W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
4.76
5
CariAnne Kreml
121W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
4.39
Mary Carroll
164W–112L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
Jennifer Cunningham
107W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
3.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.