Teams

Set2Win

2026 TRI-LEVEL - MAGIC VALLEY · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-12vs Tri-HarderWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Jamie LaMure vs Sloane Mashaal / Candace Wright3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Barnum / Anne Elise Hertl vs Kelcie Dickerson / Rachel Sandersfeld7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Nancy Silva vs Elizabeth Lassen / Kim Ward6-4, 6-2
2026-07-29vs Tri-HarderWon 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Jennifer Preucil vs Sloane Mashaal / Kelcie Dickerson6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Barnum / Anne Elise Hertl vs Jamie King / Jena Clayville6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Nancy Silva vs April O'Berg / Kim Ward6-1, 6-1
2026-07-22vs Tri-HarderWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Jamie LaMure vs Sloane Mashaal / Candace Wright2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnnette Barnum / Anne Elise Hertl vs Jena Clayville / Kelcie Dickerson6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Susan Whitney vs Elizabeth Lassen / April O'Berg6-3, 7-6
2026-06-24vs Tri-HarderWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Levings / Jennifer Preucil vs Sloane Mashaal / Candace Wright1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Cooper / Jamie LaMure vs Jamie King / Kelcie Dickerson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnie Maughan / Nancy Silva vs Elizabeth Lassen / Kim Ward6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Tri-HarderLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Call / Jennifer Preucil vs Sloane Mashaal / Candace Wright2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJamie LaMure / Melissa Lewis vs Rachel Sandersfeld / Jena Clayville6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJudy Graf / Susan Whitney vs Elizabeth Lassen / Samantha Bertomen2-6, 1-6
2026-05-18vs Tri-HarderLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Call / Jennifer Preucil vs Candace Wright / Sloane Mashaal1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Barnum / Cathy Cooper vs Jamie King / Jena Clayville3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesConnie Maughan / Nancy Silva vs April O'Berg / Kim Ward6-1, 7-5
2026-04-29vs Tri-HarderWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Preucil / Anne Elise Hertl vs Sloane Mashaal / Kelcie Dickerson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJamie LaMure / Cathy Cooper vs Rachel Sandersfeld / Jena Clayville6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesConnie Maughan / Judy Graf vs April O'Berg / Elizabeth Lassen5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-20vs Tri-HarderLost 03
L#1 DoublesCathy Cooper / Jamie LaMure vs Sloane Mashaal / Candace Wright1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnnette Barnum / Melissa Lewis vs Jamie King / Rachel Sandersfeld4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Silva / Susan Whitney vs Samantha Bertomen / Kim Ward6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Cynthia Levings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Jamie LaMure
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.47
Jennifer Preucil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Annette Barnum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Nancy Silva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Judy Graf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Cathy Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.91
Melissa Lewis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.86
Connie Maughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Susan Whitney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Graf + Cathy Cooper4260% games+15.8% vs expected
Annette Barnum + Nancy Silva11362% games+8.9% vs expected
Cathy Cooper + Annette Barnum7358% games+7.6% vs expected
Judy Graf + Jamie LaMure7070% games+4.0% vs expected
Cathy Cooper + Nancy Silva1545% games+1.4% vs expected
Judy Graf + Annette Barnum12656% games−2.3% vs expected
Susan Whitney + Judy Graf5549% games−4.0% vs expected
Connie Maughan + Judy Graf11453% games−7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Levings
31W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Jamie LaMure
41W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
4
Jennifer Preucil
2W–6L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Annette Barnum
56W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Nancy Silva
29W–36L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Judy Graf
82W–67L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Cathy Cooper
41W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.96
3.5
Melissa Lewis
23W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Connie Maughan
53W–75L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Susan Whitney
46W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.