Teams

Hurd-ing Cats

2025 ADULT 55 & Over SUMMER DAYTIME · 7.0 WOMEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-24vs ThiesWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarcia Harris / Jessica Stone vs Barb Brown / Kathryn Schneider6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDyanne Bauer / Jacie Hurd vs Beth Arel / Lily Lockwood6-4, 6-1
2025-07-17vs Sommers Summer 2025Won 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Kathleen Kennedy vs Kathy Sommers / Jacqueline DeVries6-4, 6-3
2025-07-10vs Gilchrist/Gabrielli 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Dobbins / Ruth Eliason vs Karen Heyer-Liljedahl / Sara Moran5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-03vs ArnoldWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Langer / Jessica Stone vs Brigitte Malone / Janet Nauman6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Galvin / Jacie Hurd vs Michele Caulfield / Marcy Chamberlain4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Haugen / Christine Rowe vs Lisa Presley / Mara Rozenburgs6-3, 6-2
2025-06-26vs Allex: Wayzata World ClassWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Christine Rowe vs Sharon Chambers / Ann Nachbor7-5, 6-1
2025-06-19vs Carney: Not My FaultWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Eliason / Jessica Stone vs Jane Hill / Julie Damico7-5, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMarcia Harris / Jill Langer vs Jacqueline Williams / Lynda Stelter6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Galvin / Amy Haugen vs Mary Patterson / Jill Sisk6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristy Reardan / Kathleen Kennedy vs Robin Ryan / Debra McCracken6-1, 6-1
2025-05-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesRuth Eliason / Lynne Rasmussen vs Barb Brown / Kathryn Schneider6-4, 6-3
2025-05-08vs Sommers Summer 2025Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEllen Dobbins / Ruth Eliason vs Jeanne Elert / Kristi Kamish-Bushinski7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lynne Rasmussen
published
3.45
Jessica Stone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Ellen Dobbins
published
3.35
Ruth Eliason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Karen Galvin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Kristy Reardan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Dyanne Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christine Rowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jill Langer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Amy Haugen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Jacie Hurd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Marcia Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kathleen Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristin von Seggern
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marcia Harris + Jill Langer3547% games−3.3% vs expected
Ellen Dobbins + Ruth Eliason314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynne Rasmussen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Jessica Stone
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
Ellen Dobbins
50W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
Ruth Eliason
263W–178L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Karen Galvin
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Kristy Reardan
26W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Dyanne Bauer
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Christine Rowe
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jill Langer
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amy Haugen
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jacie Hurd
23W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Marcia Harris
16W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Kennedy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kristin von Seggern
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.