Teams

LOCH.Gloer

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-14vs TOC.MurdockLost 02
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesKylie Griep vs Sapna Varkey1-6, 1-6
2024-12-01vs TOC.WilsonWon 10
W#3 SinglesVanessa Gloer vs Allyson Schneider6-3, 6-3
2024-11-07vs TOC.MurdockLost 03
L#1 SinglesThaiza Gloer vs Caroline Yu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKylie Griep vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Sapna Varkey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-10-30vs TOC.WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKylie Griep vs Jenny Doyle2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Rebekah Schloemann6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-16vs TOC.MurdockSplit 11
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Liz Chen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesThaiza Gloer vs Mallory Altneu6-1, 6-0
2024-10-09vs TOC.WilsonLost 02
L#1 SinglesThaiza Gloer vs Smita Paranjape7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Michele Wilson2-6, 4-6
2024-09-25vs TOC.MurdockWon 20
W#2 SinglesVanessa Gloer vs Lindsay Murdock3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Mallory Altneu6-4, 6-2
2024-09-18vs TOC.WilsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Smita Paranjape2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Thaiza Gloer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kylie Griep
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.77
Carolyn Lee
published 4
3.65
Vanessa Gloer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.55
Yvette LeGrande
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.48
Christine Reinke
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thaiza Gloer + Vanessa Gloer151153% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Thaiza Gloer
101W–65L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Kylie Griep
19W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carolyn Lee
26W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Vanessa Gloer
88W–53L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–139L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.55
3.5
Christine Reinke
47W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.