Teams

TOC.Murdock

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-14vs LOCH.GloerWon 30
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Yvette LeGrande6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Carolyn Lee7-6, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Kylie Griep6-1, 6-1
2024-12-13vs TOC.WilsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Smita Paranjape6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Michele Wilson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-07vs LOCH.GloerWon 20
W#2 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Kylie Griep6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Yvette LeGrande3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-23Lost 01
L#2 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Carrie Guthrie6-7, 3-6
2024-10-16vs LOCH.GloerWon 10
W#3 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Christine Reinke6-1, 6-1
2024-10-02vs TOC.WilsonSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSapna Varkey vs Michele Wilson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMary Clare Rosemeyer vs Allyson Schneider6-0, 6-3
2024-09-25vs LOCH.GloerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLeigh Barter vs Rebecca Reynolds4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLindsay Murdock vs Vanessa Gloer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Ayako Otsuka
published 4
4.04
Sapna Varkey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
4.03
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
4.01
Lindsay Murdock
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.86
Leigh Barter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.70
Liz Chen
published
3.55
Anna Kooper
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sapna Varkey + Lindsay Murdock314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ayako Otsuka
129W–46L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
4.22
4
Sapna Varkey
81W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
4.04
4
Mary Clare Rosemeyer
122W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Lindsay Murdock
149W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Caroline Yu
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Leigh Barter
186W–64L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.86
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Anna Kooper
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.