Teams

TOC.Wilson

2024 CTRL Fall Singles 18 & Over · Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-13vs TOC.MurdockLost 02
L#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Caroline Yu1-6, 2-6
2024-12-01vs LOCH.GloerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Christine Reinke6-3, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Vanessa Gloer3-6, 3-6
2024-11-13vs TOC.MurdockLost 12
L#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Caroline Yu4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Anna Kooper6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Liz Chen3-6, 2-6
2024-10-30vs LOCH.GloerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Kylie Griep6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Yvette LeGrande4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-10-23vs TOC.MurdockWon 10
W#1 SinglesJenny Doyle vs Liz Chen6-3, 6-1
2024-10-09vs LOCH.GloerWon 20
W#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Thaiza Gloer5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Rebecca Reynolds7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-10-02vs TOC.MurdockLost 01
L#2 SinglesAllyson Schneider vs Mary Clare Rosemeyer0-6, 3-6
2024-09-18vs LOCH.GloerWon 21
W#1 SinglesSmita Paranjape vs Yvette LeGrande6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRebekah Schloemann vs Rebecca Reynolds6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesMeghan Rider vs Carolyn Lee1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Smita Paranjape
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Jenny Doyle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.78
Amanda Fish
published 4
3.64
Meghan Rider
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Rebekah Schloemann
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.57
Emily Childs
published
3.32
Allyson Schneider
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Childs + Meghan Rider2548% games+5.3% vs expected
Meghan Rider + Rebekah Schloemann3553% gamesnot enough data
Allyson Schneider + Rebekah Schloemann404 matchesnot enough data
Allyson Schneider + Meghan Rider303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Smita Paranjape
82W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.97
4
Jenny Doyle
104W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
4
Amanda Fish
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Meghan Rider
341W–169L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Rebekah Schloemann
99W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Emily Childs
31W–33L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Allyson Schneider
291W–172L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.