Teams

JTC Justis

2024 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-24vs DB AdkinsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Garcia-Crespo / Caroline Smith vs Susie Finfrock / Colleen Anderson6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Spink / Marisa Rodriguez vs Cynthia Townsend / Amanda Sholty6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudith Bertran / Camille Pauly vs Heather Adkins / Christina Hamilothoris6-1, 6-1
2024-11-17vs Alachua/Johnson/18&Over6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Faun Carlson vs Ali Messenger / Jennifer Hitchcock5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAngie Gomez / Lisa Booth vs Kelsy Hill / Kelly Cordell6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Jodi Cox vs Jennifer Halinski / Carla Intal1-6, 6-7
2024-11-15vs 300 Deez NetzLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Lisa Booth vs Stephanie Ryan / Lauren Indelicato2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJodi Cox / Anita Rajasekhar vs Alicia Pfahler / Cameron Rosenthal4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-11-14vs HCC FoxWon 21
L#1 DoublesAshley Spink / Faun Carlson vs Rhoda Wilburn / Hebah Fox7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Jodi Cox vs Elizabeth Howell / Naomi Edmunds6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJudith Bertran / Camille Pauly vs Tania Alavi / Rachael van Dyke6-0, 6-1
2024-11-04vs JTC ZerbeWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Spink / Marisa Rodriguez vs Michelle Burns / Rachael Seidler6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJudith Bertran / Faun Carlson vs Julia Morrisroe / Michaela Hogan6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Garcia-Crespo / Lauren Moehle vs Linda Sheehan / Jill Womble6-4, 6-3
2024-10-27vs JTC ZaldivarWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnita Rajasekhar / Faun Carlson vs Abigail Foster / Kim Newsom6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Sophie Marcoux vs Catherine Birch / Ann Redfern6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAngie Gomez / Lisa Booth vs Elizabeth Johnson / Maria Zaldivar6-0, 6-1
2024-10-18vs Alachua/Johnson/18&Over6.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Spink / Sophie Marcoux vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Cassie Johnson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJudith Bertran / Caroline Smith vs Kannika Torres / Abigail Dellovade2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Justis / Camille Pauly vs Natalie Ebner / Jane Shin6-3, 7-5
2024-10-11vs JTC ZerbeWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Marisa Rodriguez vs Julia Morrisroe / Silvia Menendez7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa Justis / Lauren Moehle vs Michelle Burns / Michaela Hogan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Anita Rajasekhar
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.51
Judith Bertran
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.46
Ashley Spink
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Melissa Justis
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Linda Garcia-Crespo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.33
Lauren Moehle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Angie Gomez
published 3.5
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Lisa Booth
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Camille Pauly
published 3.5
3.16
Jodi Cox
published
3.02
Sophie Marcoux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Faun Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Marisa Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Spink + Faun Carlson5262% games+18.9% vs expected
Marlene Townsend + Linda Garcia-Crespo8266% games+13.5% vs expected
Linda Garcia-Crespo + Lisa Booth6460% games+2.2% vs expected
Judith Bertran + Melissa Justis5257% games+1.3% vs expected
Faun Carlson + Lisa Booth8358% games+0.8% vs expected
Ashley Spink + Linda Garcia-Crespo6554% gamesnot enough data
Judith Bertran + Linda Garcia-Crespo7353% gamesnot enough data
Ashley Spink + Judith Bertran5168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anita Rajasekhar
130W–74L career · 8 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Judith Bertran
181W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Ashley Spink
133W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Melissa Justis
93W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%27%
3.42
3.5
Linda Garcia-Crespo
231W–126L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Lauren Moehle
79W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Angie Gomez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Booth
168W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Camille Pauly
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jodi Cox
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Sophie Marcoux
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Faun Carlson
77W–70L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Marisa Rodriguez
28W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
2.88

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.