Teams

Hempfield - Schlageter

2024 USTA 55 & Over Mx Doubles League · 7.0 Mixed Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-04-14vs RCW - Walden-CookLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Nichols / Lore Rigano vs David Stover / Jennifer Graham6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndy Loose / Catherine Shaak vs Octavio Falcucci / Amber Kroh5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Roeder / Amanda Caporaletti vs Webb Cook / Carol Dimm4-6, 0-6
2024-03-16vs Wisehaven - Crowley / LaVigneWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Trisha Pearson vs Adib Eddy Geadah / Robin Treider1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNICK DOWNEY / Kristin Schlageter vs Anthony LaVigne / Ila Gambino6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Roeder / Catherine Shaak vs Tom Yake / Lisa McCormack6-2, 6-1
2024-03-02vs Hempfield - ClarkLost 12
W#1 DoublesLore Rigano / Stephen Nichols vs Deborah Broskey / Gregg Pearson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmanda Caporaletti / NICK DOWNEY vs Teresa Clark / ANTHONY KURY4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTina Loose / Steve Berkley vs Susan Eurich / Brian Hauck4-6, 2-6
2024-02-24vs West Shore - EckhausWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Trisha Pearson vs Steve Price / Susan Fridirici6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Nichols / Lore Rigano vs Jeff Brent / Holly Tiley6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStas Valldes / Melanie Vanvalkenburgh vs Mel Eckhaus / Rizwana Soulliard2-6, 3-6
2024-02-18vs Hershey - Topspin (McHugh)Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Amanda Caporaletti vs Chris Smetak / Marilou Cockroft6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJill Hauck / Tom Saltzer vs Michael McHugh / Lucinda McHugh5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Berkley / Tina Loose vs Leon Krepps / Anna Ash7-6, 6-0
2024-02-10vs West Shore - MaxtonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Trisha Pearson vs Timothy Shughart / Darlene Shughart6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStas Valldes / Catherine Shaak vs Michael Larsen / Celia Larsen4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Roeder / Amanda Caporaletti vs Steven Barber / Linda Donnelly5-7, 4-6
2024-02-04vs YACTA - Bream TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Kristin Schlageter vs Susan Kolmer / Thomas Kolmer6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Caporaletti / Tom Saltzer vs Carolyn Cockey / Rob Schwartz7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Loose / Steve Berkley vs Linda Isenberger / Marty Jacobs6-2, 6-3
2024-01-27vs RCW - Kay's Krew (Burrichter)Won 30
W#1 DoublesStephen Nichols / Lore Rigano vs Gregory Girolamo / Carolyn Salisbury6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Roeder / Amanda Caporaletti vs Thomas Manchak / Kelly Trach6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNICK DOWNEY / Jill Hauck vs Carol Blitz / Joe Miller6-4, 7-6
2024-01-20vs YACTA - GreenholtLost 12
L#1 DoublesStas Valldes / Kristin Schlageter vs Troy Petry / Deborah Mooradian2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Hauck / John Roeder vs Matt Moran / Diane Greenholt3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAndy Loose / Trisha Pearson vs Gregory Bankert / Eva Hess Phillips6-4, 6-0
2024-01-13vs Hempfield - Weik / NoltWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndy Loose / Trisha Pearson vs Cheryl Bogardus / Hiroshi Goromaru6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNICK DOWNEY / Melanie Vanvalkenburgh vs Jeff Fulmer / Bonnie Weaver6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTina Loose / Steve Berkley vs Donald Slack / Sharon Hess7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.0 Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1West Shore - Eckhaus01022820225
2YACTA - Greenholt01022821241
3Hempfield - Campbell01021921218
4Wisehaven - Crowley / LaVigne01021924229
5Hempfield - Schlageter010181227259
6Hershey - McNulty010161432249
7West Shore - Maxton010161433279
8RCW - Walden-Cook010141636294
9RCW - Loose Strings (Johnson)010111942304
10YACTA - Bream Team010111943309
11Hempfield - Baumer 7.0010102045320
12Hershey - Topspin (McHugh)01092147334
13RCW - Kay's Krew (Burrichter)01072350334
14Hempfield - Weik / Nolt01032755335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Stephen Nichols
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Tina Loose
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Steven Jeffrey
published 4
3.41
Melanie Vanvalkenburgh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Trisha Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 92%, also #3 Doubles 8% · published
3.33
John Roeder
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.31
Amanda Caporaletti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Andy Loose
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Catherine Shaak
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kristin Schlageter
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
NICK DOWNEY
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Stas Valldes
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Lore Rigano
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.94
Tom Saltzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Steve Berkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Hauck
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Loose + Trisha Pearson30860% games+9.7% vs expected
Melanie Vanvalkenburgh + NICK DOWNEY8253% games+2.4% vs expected
Jill Hauck + NICK DOWNEY8358% games+2.2% vs expected
Kristin Schlageter + NICK DOWNEY51047% games+1.0% vs expected
Tina Loose + Andy Loose9457% games+0.9% vs expected
Tom Saltzer + Jill Hauck2646% games−1.3% vs expected
Amanda Caporaletti + John Roeder4454% games−2.9% vs expected
Tina Loose + Tom Saltzer5264% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Nichols
33W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Tina Loose
207W–125L career · 10 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Steven Jeffrey
139W–80L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Melanie Vanvalkenburgh
110W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
Trisha Pearson
270W–98L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
John Roeder
157W–147L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Amanda Caporaletti
186W–160L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Andy Loose
189W–202L career · 15 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Catherine Shaak
145W–108L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Kristin Schlageter
203W–251L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.15
NICK DOWNEY
186W–148L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Stas Valldes
68W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
3.09
3
Lore Rigano
94W–84L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
Tom Saltzer
130W–153L career · 4 lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Steve Berkley
41W–37L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jill Hauck
142W–138L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.