Teams

USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-17vs USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesMC Nguyen / Contien Pei vs Lacrymosa Casey / Cassandra Crockett6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesZane Maraschiello / Stephanie Kingery vs Marsha Johnson / Tiara McClain0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Middlebrooks / Mandi Sena vs Courtney Wainscott / Karen Webb-Smith6-4, 5-7, 1-6
2026-03-10vs Rockdale TC (Adrienne Wise)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesMC Nguyen / Jennifer O'Donnell vs Dana Harvey / Nayasha Mendez6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJackie McMillon / Iris Staten vs Camelia Coleman / Karen Coppins6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesContien Pei / Robin Middlebrooks vs Vicki Johnson / Adrienne Wise6-1, 6-2
2026-03-03vs Sugar Creek (Lajuana Lovelace)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesMC Nguyen / Iris Staten vs Lajuana Lovelace / Audrey LaBranch6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer O'Donnell / Mandi Sena vs Tracy Booker / Cheryl Coleman6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesZane Maraschiello / Lori Perrone vs Jacqueline Mosley / Caniece Haywood0-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesIris Staten / MC Nguyen vs Lucinda Merriweather / Peggy Hosey6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesContien Pei / Jennifer O'Donnell vs Tiffany Baines / Marsha Johnson3-6, 6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiana Lerner / Zane Maraschiello vs Takera Mitchell / Tiara McClain1-6, 2-6
2026-02-17vs Rockdale TC (Adrienne Wise)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesMC Nguyen / Iris Staten vs Dana Harvey / Tabatha Lamadieu6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynnessa Snodgrass / Jennifer O'Donnell vs Karen Coppins / Sulinda Walker6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMandi Sena / Lori Perrone vs Adrienne Wise / Adriane Ivey4-6, 7-5, 3-6
2026-02-10vs Sugar Creek (Lajuana Lovelace)*Won 21
L#1 DoublesIris Staten / Mandi Sena vs Wanda Haywood / Audrey LaBranch6-2, 5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesContien Pei / Jackie McMillon vs Ramani Damera / Caniece Haywood6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Lerner / Lynnessa Snodgrass vs Cheryl Coleman / Monique Brown6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen5112613152
2Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)*5112613145
3Wild Timber (Candi Harris)*5114413172
4Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)*4212613139
5USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-Smith429920176
6MJCCA (Sarah Kirshner)*3311717181
7Rockdale TC (Adrienne Wise)*3310821177
8Fieldstone (Andrea Brown)*3381023207
9Brookfield (Julie Holloway)*3381025228
10Chastain (Cathy Brown)*2481021162
11Lansmoore Club (Sujung Chie)*2471123185
12Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*1541428204
13Sugar Creek (Lajuana Lovelace)*0651328204
14Three Chimneys (Joanna Bovee)*0631530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Iris Staten
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.49
Jennifer O'Donnell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Lynnessa Snodgrass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Mandi Sena
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
MC Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Contien Pei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Diana Lerner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Zane Maraschiello
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Robin Middlebrooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Jackie McMillon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Lori Perrone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephanie Kingery
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynnessa Snodgrass + Jennifer O'Donnell9165% games+12.2% vs expected
Mandi Sena + Iris Staten7159% games−1.2% vs expected
MC Nguyen + Jennifer O'Donnell303 matchesnot enough data
MC Nguyen + Iris Staten303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Iris Staten
46W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jennifer O'Donnell
23W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Lynnessa Snodgrass
31W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
3.48
Mandi Sena
32W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
3.46
MC Nguyen
31W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Contien Pei
38W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Diana Lerner
53W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Zane Maraschiello
10W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Robin Middlebrooks
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Jackie McMillon
25W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Lori Perrone
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
2.76
Stephanie Kingery
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.