Teams

Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-17vs Chastain (Cathy Brown)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesQuaNeem Saafir / Carolyn Wilson vs Sara Partin / Catherine Brown6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaTanya Davis / Beth Smith vs Tamera Woodard / Shannon Kahn6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDanielle Lewis / Sarah Head vs Sterling Lanken / Jill MacRae6-2, 6-2
2026-03-10vs Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTracee Williams / Beth Smith vs Joy Eleby / Crysenthia Stewart2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSarah Head / Danielle Lewis vs Kara Dobbin / Nkeiru Ojemaye-Abell4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Wilson / QuaNeem Saafir vs Nancy Chambers / Rebecca Cole6-4, 6-1
2026-03-03vs Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Smith / Carolyn Wilson vs Rebecca Seay / Julie Willby6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarijuana Brockington-Shaw / Monique Armstrong vs Tiffany Cullinan / Kim Janke4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTracee Williams / LaTanya Davis vs Kelly Lyemance / Teresa Knox7-5, 4-6, 6-0
2026-02-24vs Chastain (Cathy Brown)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesTracee Williams / Beth Smith vs Shannon Kahn / Tamera Woodard6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Head / Danielle Lewis vs Renata Gibson / Madhavi Vajani6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMonique Armstrong / Sharon Douglas vs Colleen Cherry / Sara Partin2-6, 3-6
2026-02-17vs Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTracee Williams / Beth Smith vs Joy Eleby / Crysenthia Stewart3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarolyn Wilson / Sarah Head vs Naranja Davis / Nadine Felton6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSharon Douglas / QuaNeem Saafir vs Kara Dobbin / Nkeiru Ojemaye-Abell2-6, 0-6
2026-02-10vs Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*Won 30
W#1 DoublesBeth Smith / Carolyn Wilson vs Teresa Knox / Julie Willby6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTracey Williams / QuaNeem Saafir vs Shelly Hutchinson / Rebecca Seay6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonique Armstrong / Sharon Douglas vs Kelly Feddersen / Anne James6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen5112613152
2Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)*5112613145
3Wild Timber (Candi Harris)*5114413172
4Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)*4212613139
5USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-Smith429920176
6MJCCA (Sarah Kirshner)*3311717181
7Rockdale TC (Adrienne Wise)*3310821177
8Fieldstone (Andrea Brown)*3381023207
9Brookfield (Julie Holloway)*3381025228
10Chastain (Cathy Brown)*2481021162
11Lansmoore Club (Sujung Chie)*2471123185
12Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*1541428204
13Sugar Creek (Lajuana Lovelace)*0651328204
14Three Chimneys (Joanna Bovee)*0631530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Tracee Williams
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
LaTanya Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
Carolyn Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Monique Armstrong
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Beth Smith
published 3.5
Danielle Lewis
published 3.5
3.24
Valerie Blakely
published
3.23
Marijuana Brockington-Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Sarah Head
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.15
QuaNeem Saafir
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Tracey Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Sharon Douglas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaTanya Davis + Tracee Williams14264% games+6.2% vs expected
Valerie Blakely + Sarah Head033 matchesnot enough data
Valerie Blakely + Carolyn Wilson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracee Williams
38W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
LaTanya Davis
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Carolyn Wilson
43W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Monique Armstrong
22W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Beth Smith
59W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Danielle Lewis
10W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Valerie Blakely
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Marijuana Brockington-Shaw
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Sarah Head
35W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.20
QuaNeem Saafir
20W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.15
Tracey Williams
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.07
Sharon Douglas
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.