Teams

Fieldstone (Andrea Brown)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Business Women (Tuesday PM) · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-17vs Wild Timber (Candi Harris)*Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bosker / Andrea McNeil Brown vs Ashley Hooie / Taryn Sobh4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Rivera / Renee Cook vs Lauren Bissonnette / Lauren Weiss7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-10vs Three Chimneys (Joanna Bovee)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea McNeil Brown / Elizabeth Bosker vs Joanna Bovee / Anita Snyder7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRenee Cook / Melanie Rivera vs Cara van Treek / Kristen Vacinek6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Boyd / Laura Knapp vs Jennifer Favors / Mirela Babic-Kujovic0-6, 4-6
2026-03-03vs Lake Forest (Laura Lajoie)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarla Bowron / Ana Ortiz vs Angela Holbrook / Lori Flick7-6, 6-7, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea McNeil Brown / Elizabeth Bosker vs Meghan Baumann / Angela Sheets1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMelanie Rivera / Renee Cook vs Stephanie Ruckh / Maggie Herman6-2, 6-3
2026-02-24vs Wild Timber (Candi Harris)*Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAndrea McNeil Brown / Ana Ortiz vs Lauren Weiss / Taryn Sobh1-6, 6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRenee Cook / Laura Knapp vs Lauren Bissonnette / Gail Griffin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Boyd / Courtney James vs Lindsay Hofmann / Candi Harris3-6, 6-3, 5-7
2026-02-17vs Three Chimneys (Joanna Bovee)*Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea McNeil Brown / Ana Ortiz vs Elizabeth Rushton / Melissa Childs6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bosker / Stephanie Boyd vs Joanna Bovee / Anita Snyder0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCourtney James / Laura Knapp vs Kristen Vacinek / Jennifer Favors7-5, 6-4
2026-02-10vs Lake Forest (Laura Lajoie)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAna Ortiz / Carla Bowron vs Buffy Torres / Paula Fagan4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Bosker / Melanie Rivera vs Angela Holbrook / Lori Flick1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAndrea McNeil Brown / Renee Cook vs Lisa Zylstra / Mia Herock6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 3.5 Women (3 Lines of Doubles - No Singles Play)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen5112613152
2Barnes Mill (Crysenthia Stewart)*5112613145
3Wild Timber (Candi Harris)*5114413172
4Washington Park (Carolyn Wilson)*4212613139
5USTA Atlanta/Karen Webb-Smith429920176
6MJCCA (Sarah Kirshner)*3311717181
7Rockdale TC (Adrienne Wise)*3310821177
8Fieldstone (Andrea Brown)*3381023207
9Brookfield (Julie Holloway)*3381025228
10Chastain (Cathy Brown)*2481021162
11Lansmoore Club (Sujung Chie)*2471123185
12Sibley Forest (Jonna Miller)*1541428204
13Sugar Creek (Lajuana Lovelace)*0651328204
14Three Chimneys (Joanna Bovee)*0631530203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Courtney James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Carla Bowron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Ana Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Laura Knapp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.24
Andrea McNeil Brown
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Melanie Rivera
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Renee Cook
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Elizabeth Bosker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Katie Reed
published
Stephanie Boyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Bosker + Andrea McNeil Brown4643% games−1.8% vs expected
Katie Reed + Stephanie Boyd3450% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Boyd + Andrea McNeil Brown3453% gamesnot enough data
Laura Knapp + Courtney James6059% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Rivera + Renee Cook224 matchesnot enough data
Courtney James + Stephanie Boyd314 matchesnot enough data
Courtney James + Andrea McNeil Brown213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bosker + Ana Ortiz303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Courtney James
40W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
3.5
Carla Bowron
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Ana Ortiz
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
Laura Knapp
20W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrea McNeil Brown
33W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Melanie Rivera
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Renee Cook
5W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
Elizabeth Bosker
25W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Katie Reed
19W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Boyd
36W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.