Teams

Stosich 55

2024 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-24vs Pocatello 55Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Fuller / Tresa Mason vs Alice Heberlein / Nyla Kress4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLurline Berry / Jinny Boozer vs Sally Nielson / Sherri Smith3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Stosich / Linda Merigliano vs Dolly Gonzales / Sylvia Williams6-0, 6-3
2024-06-21vs Slice GirlsWon 21
W#1 DoublesTresa Mason / Jinny Boozer vs Melanie Smith / Linda Zentner6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLurline Berry / Nicole Michaelson vs Cyndy Boorman / Angie Anderson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Kay Modi vs Debbie Hall / Michelle Sayer6-1, 6-2
2024-06-18vs Pocatello 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Julie Umphlette vs Alice Heberlein / Nyla Kress0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Roach / Collette Bott vs Cindy McRoberts / Sherri Smith2-6, 0-6
2024-06-12vs Slice GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Roach / Tresa Mason vs Angie Anderson / Cyndy Boorman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Kay Modi vs Renee Schart / Teresa Beebe2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Stosich / Julie Umphlette vs Karen Harris / Melanie Nelson0-6, 2-6
2024-06-10vs Slice GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Michaelson / Lisa Roach vs Lynda Fennern / Mona Palmer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCollette Bott / Tresa Mason vs Jennifer Crofts / Karen Harris6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJackie Fuller / Deborah Stosich vs Michelle Sayer / Melanie Smith4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-06vs Pocatello 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Michaelson / Lisa Roach vs Sally Nielson / Sherri Smith6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Fuller / Deborah Stosich vs Syndee Kemp / Kelly Wathne6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLinda Merigliano / Kay Modi vs Dolly Gonzales / Cindy McRoberts6-4, 6-2
2024-06-03vs Slice GirlsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Umphlette / Lisa Roach vs Angie Anderson / Debbie Hall2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLurline Berry / Nicole Michaelson vs Jennifer Crofts / Renae Gauchay7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCollette Bott / Jinny Boozer vs Lynda Fennern / Mona Palmer1-6, 2-6
2024-05-28vs Pocatello 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesLurline Berry / Nicole Michaelson vs Dolly Gonzales / Kathleen Sorenson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTresa Mason / Deborah Stosich vs Marianne Squires / Sylvia Williams6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCollette Bott / Julie Umphlette vs Cindy McRoberts / Sally Nielson2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Women 8.0 - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Slice Girls6218620182
2Stosich 553591531225
3Pocatello 553591532233

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Tresa Mason
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.66
Lurline Berry
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.62
Linda Merigliano
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Julie Umphlette
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Deborah Stosich
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Collette Bott
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
Jackie Fuller
published
Jinny Boozer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kay Modi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nicole Michaelson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Stosich + Julie Umphlette1540% games−19.2% vs expected
Julie Umphlette + Collette Bott7456% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Stosich + Tresa Mason3445% gamesnot enough data
Lurline Berry + Nicole Michaelson1443% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Stosich + Jinny Boozer314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Umphlette + Linda Merigliano213 matchesnot enough data
Kay Modi + Linda Merigliano213 matchesnot enough data
Collette Bott + Tresa Mason033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tresa Mason
140W–158L career · 5 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
4
Lurline Berry
88W–101L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Linda Merigliano
49W–76L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Julie Umphlette
86W–72L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Deborah Stosich
78W–81L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Collette Bott
66W–91L career · 10 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jackie Fuller
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jinny Boozer
37W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kay Modi
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Michaelson
14W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.