Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM3.5B

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#2 DoublesVishal Shenoy / Steve Heninger vs Lee Bader / Scott Zhang6-2, 6-0
2023-06-03vs WILLOW PASS PK 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Heninger / Michael Morley vs Jonathan Indick / Bellal Daunish6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-05-13vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5BLost 01
L#2 DoublesSteve Heninger / Vishal Shenoy vs ANAND MADDULA / Sandeep Rohilla4-6, 1-6
2023-05-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Heninger / Douglas Fish vs Angad Bhullar / Sandeep Sharma6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesSteve Heninger / Chris Haskell vs Mark Vella / Bob Garrett6-4, 6-2
2023-05-07vs MISSION HILLS 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVishal Shenoy / Steve Heninger vs Sai Lee / Charles Lin7-6, 6-4
2023-04-23vs PINOLE PK 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Heninger / Marcus Lee vs Albert Chu / William Reid6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-04-22vs BAY CLUB PL 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesSteve Heninger / Vishal Shenoy vs Evan Lampi / Juraj Svec7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-16vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#2 DoublesVishal Shenoy / Steve Heninger vs Rahul Kuruvilla / Muthubatcha Purushothaman6-4, 6-2
2023-04-15vs WILLOW PASS PK 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesSteve Heninger / Alan Roth vs Valhermoso Asuncion / Noel Fudalan6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Chris Haskell
published 3.5
3.30
Steve Heninger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.27
Douglas Fish
published
3.22
Joel Warford
published
3.17
Cliff Johnson
published 3.5
3.16
Paul Dentler
published
3.16
Peter Houston
published
3.15
Jerome Crochat
published
3.11
Doug van Slyke
published
2.74
Perry Seto
published
1.90
Alan Roth
published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Haskell
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Steve Heninger
52W–50L career · 10 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Douglas Fish
10W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Joel Warford
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Cliff Johnson
39W–26L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Paul Dentler
4W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Peter Houston
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Jerome Crochat
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Doug van Slyke
8W–22L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Perry Seto
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
2.5
Alan Roth
1W–13L career · type A · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.