Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Centre Court Behnke Sun 10 $22

CDTA Winter 55 & over W · E

20 players · average NTRP 3.78 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#3 DoublesBarbara Lee-Budin / Jackie Spicuzza vs Katherine Bianchi / Catherine Wasylenko6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesYumi Ida / Keiko Okuda vs Jacqueline Henderson / Julie Colhoun6-1, 5-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIrene Powers / Jackie Spicuzza vs Ling Arenson / Julie Weidner1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKeiko Okuda / Ann Wiet vs Annette Hennessy / Kate Newman6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYoungran Chung / Jackie Spicuzza vs Gayle Dominicis / Dawn Baumann1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKeiko Okuda / Mya Murata vs Linda Borst / Erica Eisner6-7, 4-1
L#1 DoublesYumi Ida / Kaoru Nishizawa vs Mari Cantorna / Diedre Castaldo3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackie Spicuzza / Patricia Behnke vs Carrie Driscoll / Cindy Monahan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKaoru Nishizawa / Lara Phillips vs Nichole Converse- Humphrey / Masako Ueda2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYoungran Chung / Audrey Geannopoulos vs Jacqueline Henderson / Robyn Hurtig7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaoru Nishizawa / Irene Powers vs Maria Lobo-Corey / Heike Spahn3-6, 6-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Behnke / Keiko Okuda vs Renee Buxton / Lori Saguto5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesAudrey Geannopoulos / Michelle Reynolds vs Narissa Breger / Lisa Potash6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.Schaumburg Pirron Sat 12 $2210227927278
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $2293251127288
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2275191740318
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2266201635271
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Centre Court Behnke Sun 10 $2257142250318
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.MT Bann Meng Sat 2 $2748122452357
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $2411192758384

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Donna Matkovic
published 4
3.76
Lara Phillips
published 4
3.76
Yumi Ida
published 4
3.71
Patricia Behnke
published 4
3.66
Kaori Kobayashi
published
3.63
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.60
Raquel Karpinski
published 4
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.59
3.58
Mya Murata
published 4
3.51
Irene Powers
published 4
3.41
Kathy Kasiurak
published 3.5
3.40
Nancy Maska
published 3.5
3.35
Debra Scheck
published 3.5
Audrey Geannopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Ann Wiet
published 3.5
3.17
Julie Pawula
published 3.5
Jackie Spicuzza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kaoru Nishizawa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Keiko Okuda
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yumi Ida + Patricia Behnke9359% games+6.5% vs expected
Donna Matkovic + Raquel Karpinski11755% games+5.9% vs expected
Lara Phillips + Raquel Karpinski6552% games+2.8% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Margo Carvell12855% games+2.7% vs expected
Mya Murata + Yumi Ida4450% games+2.0% vs expected
Mya Murata + Patricia Behnke6257% games+1.6% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Patricia Behnke7751% games+0.2% vs expected
Raquel Karpinski + Patricia Behnke81945% games−4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Donna Matkovic
167W–127L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Lara Phillips
98W–91L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Yumi Ida
185W–161L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Patricia Behnke
103W–89L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Kaori Kobayashi
21W–33L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Margo Carvell
138W–93L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
4
Raquel Karpinski
83W–105L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Barbara Lee-Budin
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Mya Murata
95W–100L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Irene Powers
32W–41L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Kathy Kasiurak
113W–82L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Nancy Maska
52W–89L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Debra Scheck
11W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Audrey Geannopoulos
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Ann Wiet
100W–95L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Julie Pawula
73W–120L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Jackie Spicuzza
37W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kaoru Nishizawa
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Keiko Okuda
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.