Teams

CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $22

CDTA Winter 55 & over W · E

16 players · average NTRP 4.04 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-03Won 10
W#3 DoublesBeth Immen / Terra Jahns vs Christina Greeley / Cara Waddle6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Immen / Zagorka James vs Patricia Behnke / Raquel Karpinski0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Janice McKane vs Dorothy OMalley / Mary Ellen Young6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRenee Buxton / Beth Immen vs Julie Colhoun / Joanne Lund6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerra Jahns / Kari McLennan vs Noreen Ohcana / Patricia Nick7-5, 6-1
2025-01-12Won 10
W#3 DoublesTeri Ayotte / Janice McKane vs Alja Hessami-Maas / Robyn Hurtig7-6, 3-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 55&OW8.0 7.Schaumburg Pirron Sat 12 $2210227927278
2CDTA W 55&OW8.0 5.Schaumburg Eisner Sun 10 $2293251127288
3CDTA W 55&OW8.0 4.Nielsen Ueda Sun 3 $2275191740318
4CDTA W 55&OW8.0 2.Tam Corey Sun 1 $2266201635271
5CDTA W 55&OW8.0 3.Centre Court Behnke Sun 10 $2257142250318
6CDTA W 55&OW8.0 1.MT Bann Meng Sat 2 $2748122452357
7CDTA W 55&OW8.0 6.Naperville Bianchi Sun 4:30 $2411192758384

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Terri Whiting
published 4.5
3.89
3.89
Terra Jahns
published 4
3.86
Beth Immen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Erica Eisner
published 4
3.70
Lici Lytle
published 4
3.68
Lori Raffone
published 4
3.68
Lori Saguto
published 4
3.68
Debra Brambora
published 4
3.59
Linda Borst
published 4
3.52
Janice McKane
published 4
3.50
Conni Stinek
published 4
3.47
Zagorka James
published 4
3.42
Renee Buxton
published 4
Kari McLennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Teri Ayotte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terra Jahns + Lori Saguto13164% games+9.9% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Linda Borst281357% games+8.8% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Anne Zanella-Gleason11169% games+7.7% vs expected
Erica Eisner + Linda Borst5554% games+6.2% vs expected
Lori Raffone + Linda Borst4154% games+6.2% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Lori Raffone6454% games+4.3% vs expected
Terri Whiting + Erica Eisner13265% games+4.0% vs expected
Terra Jahns + Anne Zanella-Gleason18760% games+3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Terri Whiting
165W–55L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4
Anne Zanella-Gleason
111W–59L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Terra Jahns
131W–84L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Beth Immen
35W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Erica Eisner
295W–139L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Lici Lytle
55W–70L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Lori Raffone
81W–81L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lori Saguto
223W–119L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Debra Brambora
180W–106L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Linda Borst
78W–75L career · no lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.59
4
Janice McKane
30W–35L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Conni Stinek
139W–109L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Zagorka James
290W–179L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
4
Renee Buxton
141W–123L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Kari McLennan
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Teri Ayotte
66W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.