Teams

CWarner/JZarambo (WSRC)

2024 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-04vs CDewaele (Springfield)Split 11
L#1 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs CHRISTI DEWAELE2-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCameron Logar vs Kara Ward6-1, 7-6
2024-08-02vs MPflum (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Shanin Trivanovic7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-23vs MPflum (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Shanin Trivanovic6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSusan Staley vs Melissa Pflum6-2, 6-1
2024-07-19vs CDewaele (Springfield)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesStacey Herndon vs Debra Schwede0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJacqui Gentile vs Volree Wade5-7, 1-6
2024-06-28vs CDewaele (Springfield)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJacqui Gentile vs Nicole Morgan6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCameron Logar vs Sarah Nitsche6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesSusan Staley vs Patti Bachner4-6, 3-6
2024-06-21vs MPflum (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 SinglesCameron Logar vs Tanya Easter-Ranftl2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJamie Zarambo vs Shanin Trivanovic6-3, 6-1
2024-06-07vs CDewaele (Springfield)Split 11
L#1 SinglesSusan Staley vs CHRISTI DEWAELE0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesCameron Logar vs Natalie Costello6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Courtney Warner
published 3
3.05
Cameron Logar
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.03
Jamie Zarambo
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.01
Stacey Herndon
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Susan Staley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Renata Riechelmann
published
2.71
Jacqui Gentile
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.68
Tasha Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Staley + Stacey Herndon9652% games−8.6% vs expected
Jacqui Gentile + Stacey Herndon314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Courtney Warner
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.11
3
Cameron Logar
82W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Jamie Zarambo
83W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Stacey Herndon
103W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Susan Staley
107W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
Renata Riechelmann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Jacqui Gentile
95W–98L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
Tasha Cooper
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.