Teams

Greenhill/Hord-Ewing W4.0S

2023 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

23 players · average NTRP 4.06 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Maribel Alvarez
published
4.12
Ashli Urano
published 4.5
3.91
3.89
Monique Black
published
3.83
Natalie Stewart
published
3.82
Deborah Becker
published 4
3.82
Gina Manning
published 4
3.79
Candice Ewing
published 4
3.77
Cherie Smith
published 4
Alex Trimper
published 4
3.71
Jerilynn Fletcher
published
3.68
Stefanie Wacker
published
3.67
3.64
Melany White
published
3.56
Jessica Melker
published
Amber Goetz
published
Jennifer Cascavilla
published
Keri Jordan
published
Lisa Dryden
published
Megan Ensign
published
Rebecca Neal
published
Stephanie Whitaker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monique Black + Candice Ewing13554% games+3.6% vs expected
Monique Black + Elizabeth Nevelow17459% games+2.1% vs expected
Elizabeth Nevelow + Candice Ewing5355% games+1.9% vs expected
Melany White + Elizabeth Nevelow404 matchesnot enough data
Monique Black + Gina Manning303 matchesnot enough data
Cherie Smith + Jerilynn Fletcher303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maribel Alvarez
29W–23L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Ashli Urano
22W–19L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Elizabeth Nevelow
67W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.91
Monique Black
63W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.89
Natalie Stewart
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.83
4
Deborah Becker
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gina Manning
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Candice Ewing
46W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Cherie Smith
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alex Trimper
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jerilynn Fletcher
36W–22L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Stefanie Wacker
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Christine Quadlander
22W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
Melany White
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jessica Melker
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Amber Goetz
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Cascavilla
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Keri Jordan
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Dryden
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Ensign
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mozhdeh Asadidezfouli
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Neal
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephanie Whitaker
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.