Teams

HG GangGreen - E. Collins

2023 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-05vs Cheval No Faults - E. JacksonWon 10
W#1 DoublesEddie Collins / Michael Dasilva vs John Straumann / Todd Abrams6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEddie Collins / Michael Dasilva vs Jakob Andersen / Gvozden Dokic5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-15vs Temple Terrace Hawks - R. WarrenerLost 01
L#1 DoublesEddie Collins / Michael Dasilva vs Gary Zirbel / Daniel Shields2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-10-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesDoug Angelone / Michael Dasilva vs Toi Phan / Juan Medina6-1, 6-3
2023-10-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesDoug Angelone / Michael Dasilva vs John Straumann / Alan Benson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDoug Angelone / Michael Dasilva vs Jose Alomar / Paul Gates3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.68
Eddie Collins
published 4
3.40
Christopher Baker
published 3.5
3.38
Chris Burdge
published 3.5
3.35
Doug Angelone
published 3.5
3.30
Sean Friday
published
3.26
Paul Haley
published
3.03
Philip Kalafut
published
2.93
Randall Smith
published
John Cotey
published
John Slatniske
published
Michael Dasilva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug Angelone + Chris Burdge6062% games+10.1% vs expected
John Cotey + Doug Angelone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Eddie Collins
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Christopher Baker
16W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Chris Burdge
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Doug Angelone
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Sean Friday
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Philip Kalafut
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Randall Smith
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.93
John Cotey
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Slatniske
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Dasilva
81W–66L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.