Teams

Middleton - 6.0

2024 NETX Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0 MIXED

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-29vs Ivey - 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Clay Hamil vs Russell Ivey / Lisa Hinshaw6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Beall / Kelly Johnston vs Kevin Jones / Traci Jones6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Middleton / Bill Parker vs Bert Sharp / Toni Sharp6-0, 6-2
2024-09-29vs Ivey - 6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Clay Hamil vs Russell Ivey / Lisa Hinshaw2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Johnston / Sharon Beall vs Skip Morton / Amelia Maxwell1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Middleton / Bill Parker vs Kevin Jones / Traci Jones6-2, 6-4
2024-09-28vs Ivey - 6.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Clay Hamil vs Mike Young / Toni Sharp6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPenny Spellman / David Youngblood vs Skip Morton / Amelia Maxwell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebra Washmon / John Isbell vs Russell Ivey / Lisa Hinshaw0-6, 2-6
2024-09-28vs Ivey - 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesJill Hamil / Clay Hamil vs Russell Ivey / Lisa Hinshaw2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Johnston / Sharon Beall vs Kevin Jones / Traci Jones7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBill Parker / Suzanne Middleton vs Jeannine McMahon / Skip Morton6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03
Jill Hamil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Clay Hamil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Sharon Beall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
David Youngblood
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Jeanne Adams
published
2.67
Suzanne Middleton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Penny Spellman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Debra Washmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Bill Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Isbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Hamil + Clay Hamil7554% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Middleton + Bill Parker303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Hamil
38W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Clay Hamil
12W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Sharon Beall
1W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
David Youngblood
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jeanne Adams
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Suzanne Middleton
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Penny Spellman
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Debra Washmon
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Bill Parker
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
John Isbell
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.