Teams

CROW CANYON CC 40AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-04-01vs BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesPia Moore / Tiffany Rashkin vs Kara Crowe / Helen Wong3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Brown / Pia Moore vs Mary Akli / Michelle Cooke7-6, 6-2
2022-03-06vs PLEASANTON 40AW3.5CWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Brown / Pia Moore vs Barbara Brooks / Cathy Althoff6-3, 6-3
2022-02-25vs BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Baker / Pia Moore vs SuLan Peebles / Julie Borjon1-6, 6-7
2022-02-23vs BAY CLUB PL 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesPia Moore / Tiffany Rashkin vs Flora Tang / Mary Reese2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-02-20vs PLEASANTON 40AW3.5BWon 10
W#1 DoublesPia Moore / Karen Schumann vs Robin Hultgren / Paige Fields7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-05vs Bay Club Fremont 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Brown / Pia Moore vs Hoai Cao / Michelle Chen6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-26vs RUBY HILL GC 40AW3.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesPia Moore / Lea McSweeney vs Carolyn Comerford / Pensri Walsh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStephanie Chamberlin / Pia Moore vs Cathy Althoff / Barbara Brooks6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-23vs BAY TREES PK 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesHeather Brown / Pia Moore vs Lula Burnett / Cathy Lee7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesHeather Brown / Pia Moore vs Jill Freeman / Lori Guariento6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Relura Horton
published
3.69
Heather Houston
published 4
3.39
Pia Moore
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
3.36
3.34
Rattana Graff
published
3.28
April Mundy
published 3.5
3.04
Debbie Baker
published 3.5
2.88
Gayle Millington
published 3
2.79
Karen Schumann
published
Susan Tricca
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Relura Horton
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.69
Pia Moore
67W–40L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
Stephanie Chamberlin
21W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Rattana Graff
4W–17L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
April Mundy
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Debbie Baker
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
Gayle Millington
5W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
Karen Schumann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
Susan Tricca
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.