Teams

Houstonian - Rally Ritas

2026 HTA Fall Friday Women's Doubles · 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Love All000000
2Cinco Ranch West - Ace Kickers000000
3Houstonian - Baby Got Backhand000000
4Briar Club - 4.0000000
5Golfcrest - Kicking Aces000000
6MPTC - Love Struck000000
7ROCC - ROCC Solid000000
8Houstonian - Force000000
9Houstonian - Rally Ritas000000
10Willow Fork - Crushers000000
11MPTC - Serve-ivors000000
12TPC Houston - Game Set Lunch000000
13Mason Creek - Double Shots000000
14Peckham Park - Sizzle Squad000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Erin Podsednik
published
3.45
Sandra Higdon
published
3.45
Jacqueline Longo
published
3.40
Amber Moyse
published 3.5
3.34
Monica Fulton
published
3.31
Charline Chen
published 3.5
3.31
Margaret Vulliez
published
3.28
Amber Alonso
published 3.5
Dannette Selph
published 3.5
3.25
Elizabetta Silva
published
3.19
Kimberly Dennison
published
3.17
BONNIE HORTON
published 3.5
3.16
Amber Hodgkiss
published 3.5
3.14
Kristy Demeritt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

BONNIE HORTON + Charline Chen6552% games+1.4% vs expected
BONNIE HORTON + Kristy Demeritt7449% games−0.2% vs expected
Kristy Demeritt + Charline Chen61047% games−2.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Longo + Kristy Demeritt314 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Longo + Margaret Vulliez314 matchesnot enough data
BONNIE HORTON + Erin Podsednik314 matchesnot enough data
BONNIE HORTON + Elizabetta Silva044 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Demeritt + Elizabetta Silva224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Podsednik
14W–11L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.49
Sandra Higdon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
Jacqueline Longo
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Amber Moyse
29W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Monica Fulton
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Charline Chen
40W–40L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Margaret Vulliez
20W–16L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Amber Alonso
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Dannette Selph
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabetta Silva
13W–23L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
Kimberly Dennison
28W–37L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
BONNIE HORTON
30W–62L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amber Hodgkiss
35W–27L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Kristy Demeritt
31W–37L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.