Teams

Willow Fork - Crushers

2026 HTA Fall Friday Women's Doubles · 4.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.58 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Love All000000
2Cinco Ranch West - Ace Kickers000000
3Houstonian - Baby Got Backhand000000
4Briar Club - 4.0000000
5Golfcrest - Kicking Aces000000
6MPTC - Love Struck000000
7ROCC - ROCC Solid000000
8Houstonian - Force000000
9Houstonian - Rally Ritas000000
10Willow Fork - Crushers000000
11MPTC - Serve-ivors000000
12TPC Houston - Game Set Lunch000000
13Mason Creek - Double Shots000000
14Peckham Park - Sizzle Squad000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Christi Hamilton
published 4
3.56
Brooke Clark
published 3.5
3.53
Ana Guzman
published 3.5
3.48
Amelia Reddington
published 3.5
3.43
Kim Kuzawa
published
3.40
Shawn Hanscom
published
3.31
Casandra Kourradi
published 3.5
3.27
Marcie Naughton
published
3.22
Kate Olsen
published
3.21
Lindsay Catterall
published
3.19
Pam Kelley
published
3.19
Maria Aranguren
published
3.14
Debbie Corman
published 3.5
3.12
Dina Russell
published
3.06
Morgan Dybala
published
Kelly Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Hamilton + Brooke Clark5354% games+11.1% vs expected
Pam Kelley + Debbie Corman6450% games+10.2% vs expected
Ana Guzman + Brooke Clark6460% games+10.1% vs expected
Casandra Kourradi + Brooke Clark6458% games+7.9% vs expected
Kim Kuzawa + Amelia Reddington5259% games+4.1% vs expected
Lindsay Catterall + Christi Hamilton2443% games+4.0% vs expected
Casandra Kourradi + Maria Aranguren5753% games+3.6% vs expected
Debbie Corman + Dina Russell6647% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christi Hamilton
66W–52L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Brooke Clark
85W–61L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Ana Guzman
21W–17L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Amelia Reddington
61W–51L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kim Kuzawa
61W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Shawn Hanscom
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Casandra Kourradi
30W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Marcie Naughton
25W–19L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Kate Olsen
24W–25L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Lindsay Catterall
26W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
Pam Kelley
42W–33L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Maria Aranguren
24W–32L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Debbie Corman
49W–58L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.14
Dina Russell
27W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.12
Morgan Dybala
17W–16L career · no lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.06
Kelly Baker
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.