Teams

ROCC - ROCC Solid

2026 HTA Fall Friday Women's Doubles · 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Love All000000
2Cinco Ranch West - Ace Kickers000000
3Houstonian - Baby Got Backhand000000
4Briar Club - 4.0000000
5Golfcrest - Kicking Aces000000
6MPTC - Love Struck000000
7ROCC - ROCC Solid000000
8Houstonian - Force000000
9Houstonian - Rally Ritas000000
10Willow Fork - Crushers000000
11MPTC - Serve-ivors000000
12TPC Houston - Game Set Lunch000000
13Mason Creek - Double Shots000000
14Peckham Park - Sizzle Squad000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Stephanie Sanders
published
3.53
Sannam Warrender
published
3.37
Sarah Mischer
published
3.37
Sarah Ofner
published
3.32
Helen Wright
published
3.29
Leigh McFarlane
published
3.29
Anne Carl
published 3.5
3.26
Merritt Marinelli
published
3.18
Christine Falgout
published 3.5
3.14
Christine Transier
published 3.5
Nicole Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Wright + Merritt Marinelli033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Sanders
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sannam Warrender
1W–5L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sarah Mischer
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
Sarah Ofner
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Helen Wright
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
3.32
Leigh McFarlane
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
3.29
3.5
Anne Carl
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Merritt Marinelli
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.26
3.5
Christine Falgout
0W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Christine Transier
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Nicole Davis
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.