Teams

CLAREMONT R and S 40MX6.0A

2023 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX6.0

26 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 24 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Simon Rabe-Hesketh
published
3.40
Alysia McDonough
published 3.5
3.35
Rachel Been
published
3.31
Kye Heinstein
published
3.31
Pete May
published
3.25
Susan Zhao
published
David Diamond
published 3.5
3.17
Una Elias
published
3.14
Susan Kung
published
3.13
Paul Kennedy
published
3.08
Janicke Polumbo
published
3.01
Micah Trilling
published
2.98
Josh Hannah
published
2.89
Denise Yamamoto
published 3
2.83
Holden Hume
published
2.83
Maryam Amini
published
2.82
Molly Kennedy
published
2.82
Jackie Vincent
published
2.79
Eric Poncelet
published
2.73
Cynthia Reiss
published 3
2.72
Annette Clear
published 3
2.64
Walter Cecka
published
2.63
Carolyn Whittle
published 3
2.61
Susie Poncelet
published
2.53
Shirley Rexrode
published
Frank Li
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josh Hannah + Denise Yamamoto314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Simon Rabe-Hesketh
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Alysia McDonough
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
Rachel Been
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Kye Heinstein
13W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Pete May
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.31
Susan Zhao
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David Diamond
1W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Una Elias
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
Susan Kung
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Paul Kennedy
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Janicke Polumbo
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Micah Trilling
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.01
Josh Hannah
15W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Denise Yamamoto
17W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Holden Hume
7W–22L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
2.83
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Molly Kennedy
9W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Jackie Vincent
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Eric Poncelet
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Cynthia Reiss
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Annette Clear
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Walter Cecka
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Carolyn Whittle
6W–11L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Susie Poncelet
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Shirley Rexrode
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
Frank Li
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.