Teams

CV-Rancho Las Palmas/Potter & Polls

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-20vs CV-LLW2-Indian Wells TG/SaharaLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Monica McCready vs Rhonda Kazdan / Sally Sterling3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKirsten Fatland / Wanda Ramos vs Tammy Pronenko / Cynthia Reyes7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNancy Closson / Pamela Milroy vs Lorna Matthew / Ria Lepage6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJill Lawrence Polls / Monica McCready vs Mistie Iseman / Lisa Lucht4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKirsten Fatland / Wanda Ramos vs Sue Cannon / Laura Lund4-6, 4-6
2024-02-21vs CV-Mission Hills CC/EvansWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirsten Fatland / Wanda Ramos vs Cheryl Evans / Monterey Xepoleas6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Fiscalini / Pamela Milroy vs Lori Romania / Sheryl Fewkes6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Lawrence Polls / Monica McCready vs Patricia Dudley / Camille Lamoureux6-3, 6-4
2024-02-07vs CV-The Springs/Allman/BretonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Monica McCready vs Carla Breton / Angela Peixotto-Monk2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKirsten Fatland / Cheryl Capriola vs Pat Chawla / Carole Huntley3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJill Lawrence Polls / Merri Wells vs Kathy McCann / Liz Enyeart2-6, 3-6
2024-01-31vs CV-Trilogy/Evangelist/SashaWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanis Barbash / Pamela Milroy vs Ann Morford / Lisa Symmonds6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Nancy Closson vs Cathy Evangelist / Karen Marcotte Solimano7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJoan Hall / Monica McCready vs Janette Morris / Kanjamat Mullally6-0, 6-2
2024-01-24vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/P TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica McCready / Cheryl Capriola vs Susan Parker / Ann Skrobut6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Milroy / Nancy Closson vs Betty Grant / Bette Kerhoulas6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesWanda Ramos / Kirsten Fatland vs Cathy Long / Rikki Daniels6-0, 6-1
2024-01-17vs CV-Sun City PD/Kim/McgeeWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Lawrence Polls / Monica McCready vs Nadine Kim / Joanne Mezin6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanis Barbash / Pamela Milroy vs Lori Greenman / Michele Mcgee6-1, 6-3
2024-01-10vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/K BuechelWon 20
W#1 DoublesJill Lawrence Polls / Monica McCready vs Celeste Armitage / Janice Campbell6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanis Barbash / Heather Fiscalini vs Julian Myers Benton / Wendi Varley6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Kirsten Fatland
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Janis Barbash
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Pamela Milroy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
Cheryl Capriola
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.64
Merri Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Joan Hall
published
3.50
Janet Dunlap
published
3.32
Wanda Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Heather Fiscalini
published
Jill Lawrence Polls
published
Monica McCready
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Closson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Potter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Closson + Pamela Milroy6557% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Ramos + Monica McCready4255% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Ramos + Kirsten Fatland4257% gamesnot enough data
Janis Barbash + Pamela Milroy404 matchesnot enough data
Monica McCready + Cheryl Capriola213 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Milroy + Cheryl Capriola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kirsten Fatland
127W–71L career · 9 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Janis Barbash
43W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Pamela Milroy
112W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Cheryl Capriola
114W–48L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
Merri Wells
70W–49L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.64
Joan Hall
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
Janet Dunlap
18W–31L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Wanda Ramos
74W–60L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Heather Fiscalini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jill Lawrence Polls
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica McCready
92W–63L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Closson
157W–86L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Potter
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.