Teams

Ren/Piedmont 18 4.0M Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 4.0 Mens Singles Sun

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-27vs Monguilod 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Wallace vs Marko Milojevic2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Wells vs Robert Foster1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Yongjin Lee1-6, 3-6
2025-07-26vs Davis 18 4.0M Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesRobert Wells vs Corey Davis1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Davis Phanthalack5-2
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Charles Chuang3-6, 0-6
2025-07-19vs Leggette 18 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Wallace vs Chris Leggette4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTan Ren vs Scot Harrison0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Rob Newman3-6, 4-6
2025-07-13vs Beuchat 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesRobert Wells vs Mikael Penteado3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Brad Green0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Scott Cunningham2-6, 1-6
2025-06-22vs Monguilod 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesRobert Wells vs Marko Milojevic1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Yongjin Lee2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Travis Bui-Klimke2-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs Beuchat 18+ 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Wallace vs Brad Green2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Scott Buchanan2-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Scott Cunningham7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-07vs Leggette 18 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesScott Wallace vs Scot Harrison0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Rob Newman1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTan Ren vs Chris Leggette2-6, 1-6
2025-05-25vs Davis 18 4.0M Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesRobert Wells vs Davis Phanthalack2-6, 0-3
L#2 SinglesAnuj Shah vs Charlie Keeley1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRobert Lynch vs Akira Terui2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mens Singles Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anuj Shah
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Robert Wells
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.46
Scott Wallace
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.46
Robert Lynch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
3.21
Tan Ren
usually #3 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anuj Shah
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert Wells
9W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Scott Wallace
15W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.46
Robert Lynch
16W–33L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
Tan Ren
20W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.