Teams

The Band's Back

2022 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 4.04 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-19vs Over ServedWon 10
W#2 DoublesJesica Mitchell / Kelley Canning vs Mardianne Howell / Patty Jackson6-0, 6-3
2022-05-13vs Racq PacqWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiana Gastanaga / Jesica Mitchell vs Dina Bostock / Debbie Davies6-1, 6-1
2022-05-12vs Sets AppealWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelley Canning / Jesica Mitchell vs Angela Larsen / Jennifer McEntee6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJesica Mitchell / Kelley Canning vs Christina Questad / Rebecca Kochvar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-04-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesJesica Mitchell / Kelley Canning vs Tina Taylor / Wendy Anderson6-1, 6-2
2022-04-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesJesica Mitchell / Kelley Canning vs Janet Wilson / Kathy Christensen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Kerri Porritt
published 4.5
3.87
Kelley Canning
published 4
3.85
Dawn Coder
published 4
3.84
Diana Gastanaga
published 4
3.83
3.82
Sandra Andersen
published 4
3.77
Paula Lawson
published 4
3.76
Connie Bartich
published 4
3.75
Tara Wolf
published 4
Erin Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 4
Kevan Ommen
published 4
3.73
Kathy Adamson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Lisa Hulsman
published 4
3.63
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.58
Dorsey Wanless
published 4
Halle Alexander
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Jesica Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Lawson + Lisa Trujillo-Dunn10655% games+9.9% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Sandra Andersen10557% games+7.8% vs expected
Kerri Porritt + Erin Peterson20664% games+7.7% vs expected
Diana Gastanaga + Sandra Andersen8265% games+4.4% vs expected
Kelley Canning + Sandra Andersen11559% games+4.2% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Diana Gastanaga6347% games+4.0% vs expected
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn + Tara Wolf17960% games+3.1% vs expected
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn + Kelley Canning4351% games−1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kerri Porritt
126W–66L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Kelley Canning
164W–107L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
3.87
4
Dawn Coder
91W–41L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Diana Gastanaga
121W–79L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Lisa Trujillo-Dunn
188W–132L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Sandra Andersen
118W–71L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Paula Lawson
203W–118L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Connie Bartich
94W–46L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Tara Wolf
74W–61L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Erin Peterson
48W–47L career · type M · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Kevan Ommen
134W–113L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Adamson
72W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lisa Hulsman
68W–50L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Maryann Moorhead
149W–107L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Dorsey Wanless
122W–94L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Halle Alexander
70W–50L career · 10 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jesica Mitchell
36W–25L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.