← Teams

MPRC-Fisher/Hart

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.89 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Carrie Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.83
Kirsten Giacomini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Kristen Benkstein
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 46% · published 4
3.57
Marie Picard
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.56
Aracelia Hettle
usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 4
3.49
Joelle Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Nancy Atkins
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.28
Robin Kaukonen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Karen McNairy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results16 ties
2019-11-10Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJanine Paulson / Marie Picard vs Carol Levine / Heide Marie Bliss1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-11-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJanine Paulson / Marie Picard vs Angela Fischels / Beci Bjornson6-4, 6-2
2019-08-24Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Kimberly Stein / Deborah Murray6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Kirsten Morrison6-3, 6-4
2019-08-23Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs Melissa Miller / Denise Wolfe3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Nami Brown / Akiko Kusano1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Jody Rolnick6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Joelle Lewis vs Theresa Park / Julie Mohler7-6, 6-4
2019-08-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Joanne Reardon / Melissa McDowell6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Nancy Atkins vs Aspen McKenna / Michele Dearing3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2019-07-14Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Lynn Sosa vs Tonya Dirk / Emiko Kogure6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Kelly Asbridge6-2, 6-3
2019-07-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAmy Jean / Marie Picard vs Catherine Crosby / Cynthia Perelli-Minetti7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Suzanne DeLea6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Joelle Lewis vs Babette Zielinski / Leslie OBrien6-1, 6-4
2019-04-13Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesEileen Reid / Joelle Lewis vs Amy Graham / Sierra Wright6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Halle Jackson6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKirsten Giacomini / Brandy Horwitz vs Theresa Mullally / Tonya Dirk7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Marie Picard vs Lisa Volle / Carrie Engle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2019-04-06Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Rie Sasakawa / Kelly Mohr6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Shamarra Jackson6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart vs Arlene Doughty / Severine Michot6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs Angelina Warriner6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-04-05Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Rochelle Hart vs Teresa Jackson / Anita Havemann6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Michele O'Brien6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Atkins / Joelle Lewis vs Allison Graham / Jeannine del Bene7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKristen Benkstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-04-03Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesMarie Picard / Julie Fagan vs Heidi Clark / Kim Stevens6-2, 7-6
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Saskia Lippy6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Peg McClendon / Nina Sanna6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Atkins / Eileen Reid vs Courtney Pierce / Diana Almy6-4, 6-0
2019-03-16Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Jill Craven / Tina Skouras6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Pam Saftler6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEileen Reid / Marie Picard vs Samantha Esmer / June Kim6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Carrie Fisher vs Elizabeth Lilly / Amanda Lowthian7-5, 6-0
2019-03-09Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRobin Kaukonen / Karen McNairy vs Sharon Kim-Geib / Vicki Mark7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Marie Picard vs Suk Ki Lee / Flor Harrigan6-3, 6-3
2019-03-03Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Laurel Cripe1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Marie Picard vs Krista Mikalatos / Julie Atchley7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Atkins / Colleen Hamilton vs Nikki Nadig / Pamela Buckley6-0, 7-6
2019-02-03Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesEileen Reid / Joelle Lewis vs Sheila Anderson / Jill Craven6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRobin Kaukonen vs Pam Saftler6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarrie Fisher / Karen McNairy vs Marie Reykalin / Kathy Pienovi6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Elizabeth Lilly7-6, 6-3
2019-01-20Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesRochelle Hart / Karen McNairy vs Lisa Lyon / Cathy Porter6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandy Horwitz / Kirsten Giacomini vs Char Riley / Antoinette Ann Reno6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAracelia Hettle vs Tara Hendrickson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoelle Lewis / Marie Picard vs Jan Rothert / Jen Woods7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Fisher
135W–80L career
0%97%3%
3.88
4
Kirsten Giacomini
93W–48L career
0%97%3%
3.83
4
Kristen Benkstein
132W–55L career
0%99%1%
3.83
4
Marie Picard
128W–96L career
18%82%0%
3.57
4
Aracelia Hettle
71W–44L career
22%78%0%
3.56
4
Joelle Lewis
37W–46L career
39%61%0%
3.49
4
Nancy Atkins
79W–82L career
38%62%0%
3.49
3.5
Robin Kaukonen
23W–53L career
1%97%2%
3.28
3.5
Karen McNairy
49W–62L career
21%79%0%
3.05

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.