SpringPark/S. Nolen W3.0S
2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League
17 players · average NTRP 3.10 / TEXAS
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule9 played
i
Flight standings14 teams · S W. Saturday League
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Fretz/DeCoursin-Kinder W3.0S | 9 | 0 | 23 | 310 |
| 2DAC/Phillips-Shackelford W3.0S | 8 | 1 | 31 | 305 |
| 3LB Houston/O'Brien W3.0S | 7 | 2 | 31 | 325 |
| 4LifeTime Frisco/Arfa-Menhart W3.0S | 6 | 3 | 42 | 347 |
| 5High Point/Jimenez W3.0S | 6 | 3 | 43 | 350 |
| 6Fretz/Savelli-Djukanovich W3.0S | 6 | 3 | 47 | 380 |
| 7SpringPark/S. Nolen W3.0S | 5 | 4 | 46 | 369 |
| 8Brookhaven/Cheyney-Goble W3.0S | 4 | 5 | 56 | 404 |
| 9Samuell Grand/Tamblyn-Wickhem W3.0S | 4 | 5 | 60 | 411 |
| 10High Point/Benso W3.0S | 3 | 6 | 56 | 403 |
| 11Huffhines/Burns-Mulligan W3.0S | 2 | 7 | 59 | 442 |
| 12Canyon Creek/Abernethy W3.0S | 2 | 7 | 66 | 457 |
| 13Prestonwood/Sander-Walters W3.0S | 1 | 8 | 60 | 427 |
| 14El Dorado/Evans-Phillips W3.0S | 0 | 9 | 78 | 502 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Monique Ramos + Kaitlen Clare | 3–3 | 47% games | not enough data |
| Karen Clemmons + Suzanne Chreene | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Karen Clemmons + Amy Northrop | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Kelly Hager + Marti Grandinetti | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Tanya Rutledge + Carol Chandler | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Tanya Rutledge + Abby Powell | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Holly Clapp + Marti Grandinetti | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.