Teams

Racketeers

2026 USTA MIXED 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 4.33 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17vs Power HittersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMark Graham / Michelle Phillips vs Kimberly Mrozek / Mike Kirby4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRilee Moorhead / Jeff Buckingham vs Rachel Kincheloe / Kyle Jewett7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Poachers 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesChad Vincent / Rilee Moorhead vs Greg Ferney / Robyn Roby6-4, 6-1
2026-04-25vs PTSA 9.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Haskell / Chad Vincent vs Dylan Raymond / Payton McGriff3-6, 5-7
2026-04-04vs Lil Rascals 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Vo / Andrew Pernell vs Alex Wong / Oleksandra Ivanova4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Evan Walther / Sydney Crabtree3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Power HittersLost 03
L#1 DoublesTheresa Haskell / Andrew Pernell vs Kevin Jay / Rebecca Newby0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Mark Graham vs Mike Kirby / Lauren Drew3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandy Vo / Chad Vincent vs Rachel Kincheloe / Richard Davey6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Poachers 9.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Buckingham / Rilee Moorhead vs Stephanie Baier / George Raad6-1, 6-4
2026-03-14Split 11
W#2 DoublesChad Vincent / Theresa Haskell vs Leiana Almaraz / Dylan Raymond4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Phillips / Jeff Buckingham vs Chad Vaughn / Kerri Porritt3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Dan Buckingham
published 5
4.77
Thomas Schoeck
published
4.76
Theresa Haskell
published 5
4.50
Rilee Moorhead
published 4.5
4.33
Mark Graham
published 4.5
4.27
Andrew Pernell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Jami Garver
published 4.5
4.03
Mike Buckingham
published 4
4.00
Debbie Merritt
published 4
3.81
Chad Vincent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Dawna Buckingham
published 4
3.65
Maryann Moorhead
published 4
3.61
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
Jeff Buckingham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Michelle Phillips
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Vo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mike Buckingham + Maryann Moorhead6648% games+9.1% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Dan Buckingham8360% games+5.6% vs expected
Dawna Buckingham + Dan Buckingham15955% games+2.1% vs expected
Maryann Moorhead + Dan Buckingham21656% games+0.1% vs expected
Mike Buckingham + Michelle Phillips2450% games−5.5% vs expected
Rilee Moorhead + Jeff Buckingham181452% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Vo + Dan Buckingham9067% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Pernell + Theresa Haskell6359% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Buckingham
127W–54L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
Thomas Schoeck
28W–10L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Theresa Haskell
81W–62L career · type M · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.76
4.5
Rilee Moorhead
72W–30L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.50
4.5
Mark Graham
130W–63L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Andrew Pernell
9W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Jami Garver
59W–49L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.09
4
Mike Buckingham
120W–80L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Chad Vincent
33W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Dawna Buckingham
94W–65L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Maryann Moorhead
148W–106L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–66L career · no lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.61
Jeff Buckingham
28W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Phillips
21W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Vo
53W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.