Teams

Deterding/Chance 65+ 6.5W

2022 Piedmont Combo 65 & Over · 6.5 Women 65 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-03vs Titzer/JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargaret Reynolds / Bobbi McEntee vs Fran Jones / Grace Titzer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-12vs Titzer/JonesLost 01
L#3 DoublesMissy Chance / Bobbi McEntee vs Wanda Davis / Betty Smith2-6, 2-6
2022-08-22vs Titzer/JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatty Dutton / Bobbi McEntee vs Fran Jones / Grace Titzer2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.29
Nancy McNeill
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
2.94
2.89
Missy Chance
published
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.83
Linda Chapman
published
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published 3
2.63
Lori Partagas
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
2.43
Bobbi McEntee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Janet Gorham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Eaton + Nancy McNeill314 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Faye Halvorsen033 matchesnot enough data
Linda Chapman + Patty Dutton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Reynolds
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Nancy McNeill
24W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Elizabeth Deterding
14W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
2.94
Missy Chance
14W–32L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
2.89
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Linda Chapman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Faye Halvorsen
16W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Lori Partagas
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
2.63
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Bobbi McEntee
87W–103L career · 3 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.43
Janet Gorham
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.