Teams

Joslin/Bella Vista/Reb

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-28vs Wendlandt/Alma/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesBillie Joslin / Pamela Larimer vs Meg Canfield / Jo Beck6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVickie Adkins / Marsha Taylor vs Patricia Cox / Leigh Wendlandt6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Sandy Stursma vs Sally Simon / Maggie Griesse6-1, 6-0
2024-09-28vs Venable/MH/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Sandy Stursma vs Debbie Goolsby / Donna Hoffmann6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Vickie Adkins vs Phyllis Venable / Nancy Decker6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Jones / Tammy Waddell vs Colleen Justus / Carolyn Kelley6-4, 6-1
2024-09-28vs Brown/LR/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Vickie Adkins vs Jemi Hall / Ruth Narveson6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandy Stursma / Barbara Johnson vs Grace Evans / Cindy Hollowell6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBillie Joslin / Pamela Larimer vs Lou Stevens / Ann Carter4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-27vs Ward/Arkadelphia/RebWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Johnson / Sandy Stursma vs Charlene Reinsch / Patti Peeler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarsha Taylor / Vickie Adkins vs B J Hampton / Kim Ward6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeslie Jones / Tammy Waddell vs Suzanne Marbury / Rita Stokes7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Sandy Stursma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.43
Pamela Larimer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Marsha Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Vickie Adkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Billie Joslin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.07
Tammy Waddell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Stursma + Vickie Adkins6063% games+6.5% vs expected
Vickie Adkins + Marsha Taylor8168% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Stursma
22W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
Pamela Larimer
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Marsha Taylor
28W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
Vickie Adkins
32W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3
Billie Joslin
16W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.09
Tammy Waddell
12W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.