Teams

LSBE-Beardslee/Westport

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Women 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.41 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-11vs LGEarnshaw/SkybrookLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Coleen Foye vs Gretchen Earnshaw / Leta Wiley0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAstrid Peterson / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Amy Barnett / Christina Gray6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Christina Mullen vs Kristen Frame / Lori Fuller1-6, 2-6
2022-10-04vs LTMerklein/NorthstoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Kathleen Stiffler vs Terri Merklein / Wendy Fairer6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-27vs LKFord-Dow/FarmsWon 20
W#2 DoublesMelissa Collins / Heather Bain vs Leslie Crane / Nanette Rose4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathleen Stiffler / Zahra Simonetti vs Liz Littlefield / Jamie McFarland6-1, 6-1
2022-09-20vs LLHolmes/ PeninsulaWon 20
W#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Kathleen Weisman vs Lori Holmes / Gayle Larson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesZahra Simonetti / Jill Sullivan-Keating vs Siobhan Peterson / Anneliese Lansing6-3, 6-0
2022-09-13vs LHMacFadyen/JettonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Danielle Curwood vs Norma Zitnik / Elize Houghton7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNicole Cochran / Astrid Peterson vs Annette Mootilal / Heather Hendershott5-7, 4-6
2022-09-07vs LKGrathwohl/River RunWon 20
W#1 DoublesDanielle Curwood / Coleen Foye vs Meredith Ortiz / Natalie Van Epps6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Christina Mullen vs Terri Utz / Bridgette Ashbrook6-1, 6-2
2022-08-23vs LSSchneider/NMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Kathleen Stiffler vs Sylvia Sullivan / Terri DeWilde6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNicole Cochran / Danielle Curwood vs Brooke Francis / Shannon Armstrong6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristina Mullen / Heather Bain vs Leslie Shaw / Samantha Schneider6-2, 6-0
2022-08-16vs LKPowell/WestportWon 30
W#1 DoublesJill Sullivan-Keating / Astrid Peterson vs Brenda Clay / Tanner Jordan6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStacy Beardslee / Christina Mullen vs Nathalie Naslund / Catherine Wulfhorst7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesColeen Foye / Kathleen Weisman vs Dana Smith / Tracy Reiser6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Danielle Curwood
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.50
Bridgett Dedmond
published 3.5
3.47
Coleen Foye
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.40
Jill Sullivan-Keating
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Ann Murphy
published 3.5
3.38
Christina Mullen
published 3.5
3.36
Kristen Rogers
published
3.27
Heather Bain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Melissa Collins
published
3.22
Astrid Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.00
Kathleen Stiffler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.97
Nicole Cochran
published
2.80
Stacy Beardslee
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.70
Kathleen Weisman
published
2.70
Zahra Simonetti
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Astrid Peterson + Nicole Cochran1433% games−11.7% vs expected
Zahra Simonetti + Heather Bain6950% gamesnot enough data
Zahra Simonetti + Stacy Beardslee4549% gamesnot enough data
Jill Sullivan-Keating + Kathleen Stiffler3544% gamesnot enough data
Heather Bain + Danielle Curwood3445% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Heather Bain2448% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Jill Sullivan-Keating4256% gamesnot enough data
Astrid Peterson + Bridgett Dedmond2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Curwood
205W–137L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%5%95%
3.71
3.5
Bridgett Dedmond
91W–62L career · no lines in 2022
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Coleen Foye
170W–76L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jill Sullivan-Keating
134W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Ann Murphy
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Christina Mullen
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kristen Rogers
18W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Heather Bain
156W–103L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Melissa Collins
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Astrid Peterson
105W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Kathleen Stiffler
152W–161L career · 7 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.00
Nicole Cochran
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Stacy Beardslee
117W–144L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.80
Kathleen Weisman
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.70
3
Zahra Simonetti
140W–173L career · 6 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.